The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Will the real socially responsible consumer please step forward?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium
Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363769910297506 · Cited by 1,611
Self-citationDo consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude—behaviour gap
Boulstridge, E., & Carrigan, M. (2000) · Journal of Communication Management · doi:10.1108/eb023532 · Cited by 559
Hwang, J., & Griffiths, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-10-2015-1560 · Cited by 288
Constructing a Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation Using Corporate Image Advertising
Pomering, A., & Johnson, L. W. (2009) · Australasian Marketing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2009.05.006 · Cited by 144
Chan, R. Y. K. (2000) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2000.11104806 · Cited by 130
Sharing and Sustainable Consumption in the Era of COVID-19
Degli Esposti, P., Mortara, A., & Roberti, G. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041903 · Cited by 121
Segmenting consumers’ reasons for and against ethical consumption
F. Burke, P., Eckert, C., & Davis, S. (2014) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-06-2013-0294 · Cited by 111
Pérez, A., & Rodríguez del Bosque, I. (2013) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20654 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, J. A.
- Venue
- Business Horizons
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-83
- ISSN
- 0007-6813 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969556175
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.