The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanical properties of hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete at low fiber volume fraction
Open accessAbstract
Concretes containing different types of hybrid fibers at the same volume fraction (0.5%) were compared in terms of compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural properties. Three types of hybrid composites were constructed using fiber combinations of polypropylene (PP) and carbon, carbon and steel, and steel and PP fibers. Test results showed that the fibers, when used in a hybrid form, could result in superior composite performance compared to their individual fiber-reinforced concretes. Among the three types of hybrids, the carbon–steel combination gave concrete of the highest strength and flexural toughness because of the similar modulus and the synergistic interaction between the two reinforcing fibers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nili, M., & Afroughsabet, V. (2010) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.11.025 · Cited by 314
Hybrid fibre reinforced concrete–A state of the art review
Vairagade, V. S., & Dhale, S. A. (2023) · Hybrid Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hybadv.2023.100035 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Yao, W., Li, J., & Wu, K.
- Venue
- Cement and Concrete Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-30
- ISSN
- 0008-8846 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083326003
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical properties of hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete at low fiber volume fraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0008-8846(02)00913-4
- The paper
- Yao, W., Li, J., & Wu, K. (2003). Mechanical properties of hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete at low fiber volume fraction. Cement and Concrete Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-8846(02)00913-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
