Cited by 64Atmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsTree-ring climate responsesGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Radiocarbon studies of plant leaves and tree rings from Mammoth Mountain, CA: a long-term record of magmatic CO2 release

Cook, Andrea C, Hainsworth, Laura J, Sorey, Michael L, Evans, William C, Southon, John R·2001·Chemical Geology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0009-2541(00)00386-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 64

Authors
Cook, A. C., Hainsworth, L. J., Sorey, M. L., Evans, W. C., & Southon, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Emory and Henry College (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Cook, Andrea C
Venue
Chemical Geology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-07
Volume
177
Issue
1-2
Pages
117-131
ISSN
0009-2541 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128927148
Cited by
64
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Geology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
Mammoth Mountain, tree-ring radiocarbon, diffuse CO2 emission, cold springs, volcanic gas flux, Horseshoe Lake

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review