The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies
Gibson, E. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1 · Cited by 2,537
Self-citation
Cited by
Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models
Jaeger, T. F. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 · Cited by 3,317
“Arnon hypothesized that, like adults (Warren & Gibson, 2002), children perform better on RCs with pronoun NPs than on RCs with lexical NPs, and that they perform better on subject RCs than on object RCs. Table 2 summarizes the mean question-answer accuracy (i.e. the proportion of correct answers)…”
BackgroundComputational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension
Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007 · Cited by 853
The communicative function of ambiguity in language
Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004 · Cited by 628
“…previous work arguing that ambiguity is rarely harmful to communication in practice thanks to the comprehender’s ability to effectively disam-biguate between possible meanings (Wasow & Arnold, 2003; Wasow et al., 2005; Jaeger, 2006; Roland, Elman, & Ferreira, 2006; Ferreira, 2008; Jaeger, 2010).”
Self-citationConsequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity
Grodner, D., & Gibson, E. (2005) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_7 · Cited by 455
Self-citationFrequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis
Roland, D., Dick, F., & Elman, J. L. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Warren, T., & Gibson, E.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-112
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168919774
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 76.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00087-2
- The paper
- Warren, T., & Gibson, E. (2002). The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00087-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
