The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968) · Cited by 5,162
Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004) · Optimality Theory in Phonology · doi:10.1002/9780470756171.ch1 · Cited by 4,683
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204507 · Cited by 2,802
The Child's Learning of English Morphology
Berko, J. (1958) · WORD · doi:10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661 · Cited by 2,474
Bybee, J. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612886 · Cited by 2,400
Word Formation in Generative Grammar
Aronoff, M. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,308
Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure
(2001) · Typological Studies in Language · doi:10.1075/tsl.45 · Cited by 2,230
Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison
Sankoff, D., & Kruskal, J. B. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,915
Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90032-7 · Cited by 1,620
Regular morphology and the lexicon
Bybee, J. (1995) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969508407111 · Cited by 1,541
Cited by
The Acquisition of Morphophonology
MacWhinney, B. (1978) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166047 · Cited by 502
Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives
Perek, F. (2015) · Constructional Approaches to Language · doi:10.1075/cal.17 · Cited by 417
Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition
Chater, N., & Manning, C. D. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.006 · Cited by 411
Wilson, C. (2006) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_89 · Cited by 398
Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony
Hayes, B., Zuraw, K., Siptár, P., & Londe, Z. (2009) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.0.0169 · Cited by 391
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Albright, A., & Hayes, B.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-161
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073610029
- Cited by
- 769
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 109.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00146-x
- The paper
- Albright, A., & Hayes, B. (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00146-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
