Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 553

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation

Sedivy, Julie C., K. Tanenhaus, Michael, Chambers, Craig G., Carlson, Gregory N.·1999·Cognition
DOI 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00025-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00025-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Altmann, 1992, Avoiding the garden-path: eye movements in context, Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 685, 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90035-V · DOI · Paper page
  2. Altmann, 1994, Effects of syntax in human sentence parsing: evidence against a structure-based proposal mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 209, 10.1037/0278-7393.20.1.209 · DOI
  3. Altmann, 1988, Interaction with context during human sentence processing, Cognition, 30, 191, 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bierwisch, M., 1987. The semantics of gradation. In: Bierwisch, M., Lang, E. (Eds.), Dimensional Adjectives. Springer, Berlin.
  5. Britt, 1994, The interaction of referential ambiguity and arguments structure in the parsing of prepositional phrases, Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 251, 10.1006/jmla.1994.1013 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Carroll, J., Bever, T., 1978. The perception of relations: a case study in the relation of knowledge and perception. In: Carterette, E., Friedmasn, M. (Eds.), Handbook of perception, Vol. 7. Academic Press, New York.
  7. Clifton, 1989, Ambiguity in context, Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 77, 10.1080/01690968908406364 · DOI
  8. Crain, S., Steedman, M., 1985. On not being led up the garden path: the use of context by the psychological parser. In: Dowty, D., Karttunnen, L., Zwicky, A. (Eds.), Natural Language Parsing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Eberhard, 1995, Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language processing in natural contexts, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 409, 10.1007/BF02143160 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ferreira, 1986, The independence of syntactic processing, Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348, 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fox, 1990, A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation, Language, 66, 297, 10.2307/414888 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Frazier, L., 1987. Theories of syntactic processing. In: Garfield, J. (Ed.), Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. · DOI
  13. Gelman, 1985, Implicit contrast in adjectives vs. nouns: implications for word-learning in preschoolers, Journal of Child Language, 12, 125, 10.1017/S0305000900006279 · DOI
  14. Halff, 1976, A context-sensitive representation of word meanings, Memory and Cognition, 4, 378, 10.3758/BF03213193 · DOI
  15. Heim, I., 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. GLSA, Amherst, MA.
  16. Jackendoff, R., 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  17. Kadmon, 1990, Uniqueness, Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 273, 10.1007/BF00627710 · DOI
  18. Kamp, 1995, Prototype theory and compositionality, Cognition, 57, 129, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00659-9 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Krifka, M., 1991. A compositional semantic for multiple focus constructions. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. · doi:10.3765/salt.v1i0.2492
  20. Maloney, 1987, Measuring the influence of context: the interpretation of dimensional adjectives, Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 205, 10.1080/01690968708406931 · DOI
  21. Marslen-Wilson, 1975, Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process, Science, 189, 226, 10.1126/science.189.4198.226 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Matin, 1993, Saccadic overhead: information processing time with and without saccades, Perceptual Psychophysics, 53, 372, 10.3758/BF03206780 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Mitchell, 1992, Effects of context in human sentence parsing: evidence against a discourse-based proposal mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 69, 10.1037/0278-7393.18.1.69 · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.1.69
  24. Murray, W., Liversedge, S., 1994. Referential context effects on syntactic processing. In: Clifton, C., Frazier, L., Rayner, K. (Eds.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
  25. Ni, W., Crain, S., Shankweiler, D., 1996. Sidestepping garden paths: assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes 11, 283–334. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Pierrehumbert, J., 1990. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation, Ph.D Dissertation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  27. Pollard, C. Sag, I., 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
  28. Rayner, 1983, The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358, 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90236-0 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rooth, 1992, A theory of focus interpretation, Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75, 10.1007/BF02342617 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Rooth, M., 1985 Association with focus, Ph.D Dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst. GLSA, Amherst, MA.
  31. Schelstraete, 1996, Definiteness and prepositional phrase attachment in sentence processing, Current Psychology of Cognition, 15, 463
  32. Sedivy, J., Tanenhaus, M., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., Carlson, G., 1995. Using intonationally-marked presuppositional information in on-line language processing: evidence from eye movements to a visual model. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
  33. Spivey-Knowlton, 1995, Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints, Cognition, 55, 227, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00647-4 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Spivey-Knowlton, M., Tanenhaus, M., 1994. Referential context and syntactic ambiguity resolution. In: Clifton, C., Frazier, L., Rayner, K. (Eds.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
  35. Steedman, M., 1989. Grammar, interpretation, and processing from the lexicon. In: Marslen-Wilson, W. (Ed.), Lexical Representation and Process. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4213.003.0022
  36. Steedman, 1989, Ambiguity in context: a reply, Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 211, 10.1080/01690968908406365 · DOI
  37. Tanenhaus, 1995, Integration of visual and linguistic information during spoken language comprehension, Science, 268, 1632, 10.1126/science.7777863 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 553

Metadata

Authors
Sedivy, J. C., K. Tanenhaus, M., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-06
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
109-147
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00025-6
OpenAlex
W2085834106
Cited by
553
References
1
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00025-6
The paper
Sedivy, J. C., K. Tanenhaus, M., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00025-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.