The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human simulations of vocabulary learning
Open accessAbstract
The work reported here experimentally investigates a striking generalization about vocabulary acquisition: Noun learning is superior to verb learning in the earliest moments of child language development. The dominant explanation of this phenomenon in the literature invokes differing conceptual requirements for items in these lexical categories: Verbs are cognitively more complex than nouns and so their acquisition must await certain mental developments in the infant. In the present work, we investigate an alternative hypothesis; namely, that it is the information requirements of verb learning, not the conceptual requirements, that crucially determine the acquisition order. Efficient verb learning requires access to structural features of the exposure language and thus cannot take place until a scaffolding of noun knowledge enables the acquisition of clause-level syntax. More generally, we experimentally investigate the hypothesis that vocabulary acquisition takes place via an incremental constraint-satisfaction procedure that bootstraps itself into successively more sophisticated linguistic representations which, in turn, enable new kinds of vocabulary learning. If the experimental subjects were young children, it would be difficult to distinguish between this information-centered hypothesis and the conceptual change hypothesis. Therefore the experimental "learners" are adults. The items to be "acquired" in the experiments were the 24 most frequent nouns and 24 most frequent verbs from a sample of maternal speech to 18-24-month-old infants. The various experiments ask about the kinds of information that will support identification of these words as they occur in mother-to-child discourse. Both the proportion correctly identified and the type of word that is identifiable changes significantly as a function of information type. We discuss these results as consistent with the incremental construction of a highly lexicalized grammar by cognitively and pragmatically sophisticated human infants, but inconsistent with a procedure in which lexical acquisition is independent of and antecedent to syntax acquisition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1995) · Cited by 6,864
The Biological Foundations of Language
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967) · Hospital Practice · doi:10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799 · Cited by 6,605
An Essay concerning Human Understanding
Locke, J. (1690) · The Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding · doi:10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020 · Cited by 5,192
Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection
Dowty, D. R. (1991) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1991.0021 · Cited by 4,480
A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523 · Cited by 3,909
The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations
Baltin, M., & Bresnan, J. (1985) · Language · doi:10.2307/414493 · Cited by 2,783
Fillmore, C. J. (1967) · Cited by 2,781
Universals in Linguistic Theory
Brekle, H. E. (1970) · Indogermanische Forschungen · doi:10.1515/if-1970-0116 · Cited by 2,764
Language Acquisition: The State of the Art
Wanner, E., & Gleitman, L. R. (2009) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,022
Self-citationLearning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small
Elman, J. L. (1993) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90058-4 · Cited by 1,988 · cited 2×
“…its conjecture (with some confidence rating) on each exposure to a new word but forgets the scenario that generated this conjecture might avoid 40 the temptation of general solutions (for learning models with these and related properties, see Elman, 1993; Goldowsky & Newport, 1996; Newport, 1990).”
Background
Cited by
Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution
Jackendoff, R. (2002) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 · Cited by 3,244
How Children Use Input to Acquire a Lexicon
Hoff, E., & Naigles, L. (2002) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00415 · Cited by 773
Individuation, relativity, and early word learning
Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001) · Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620669.010 · Cited by 758
Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech
Mintz, T. H. (2003) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00140-9 · Cited by 597
Quality of early parent input predicts child vocabulary 3 years later
Cartmill, E. A., Armstrong, B. F., Gleitman, L. R., Goldin-Meadow, S., Medina, T. N., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1309518110 · Cited by 419
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L., & Lederer, A.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-176
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028072294
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 29.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human simulations of vocabulary learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00036-0
- The paper
- Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L., & Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00036-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.