Cited by 214Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychological Testing and AssessmentMental Health and Psychiatry

Exploring cognitive complaints in schizophrenia: the subjective scale to investigate cognition in schizophrenia

Stip, E, Caron, J, Renaud, S, Pampoulova, T, Lecomte, Y·2003·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

While it has become commonplace to test the various components of memory in schizophrenia with paper-and-pencil or in-lab tasks, very little data exist on the subjective complaints of patients regarding their memory. Few instruments have been designed to collect systematically the complaints of patients with schizophrenia. We present a work in progress on the Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (SSTICS), a 21-item, Likert-type scale that is simple and easy to use. It allows a quantitative approach to the subjective and cognitive dimensions of schizophrenia. Stip constructed the scale based on a questionnaire covering several cognitive domains: memory (working memory, explicit long-term memory), attention (divided, distractibility, alertness, sustained), language, and praxia. We evaluated the psychometric properties of the SSTICS in a population of 114 French-speaking patients in Montreal. Patients were recruited in the community and assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale (ESRS). Cognition was measured using the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (long-term memory), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (verbal fluency), and Trails A and B. Preliminary analyses showed very good internal consistency for the global score (alpha=0.88), and alphas varying from 0.57 to 0.72 for the subscales. Stability over time was very good. T…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-440x(03)00086-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stip, E., Caron, J., Renaud, S., Pampoulova, T., & Lecomte, Y.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CA)
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
331-340
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076371841
Cited by
214
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, subjective cognitive complaints, memory impairment, working memory, long-term memory, attention, psychometric validation, internal consistency, test-retest stability, subjective-objective correlation, French-speaking patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review