Cognitive Phenotypes in Alzheimer's Disease and Genetic Risk
Abstract
Variation in the clinical characteristics of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasingly recognised, although the factors underlying variation are not fully understood. The study examined the cognitive characteristics of 523 AD patients at the time of their presentation to a neurological dementia clinic and explored the relationship to family history and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype. Distinct profiles were identified, which were mirrored by topographical differences on neuroimaging. Clinical distinctions were maintained over time. Two-thirds of patients showed a constellation of deficits at presentation which included memory, language, visuospatial and constructional difficulties. However, a quarter had circumscribed presentations of amnesia, aphasia, perceptuospatial disorder or apraxia. The rare presence of frontal lobe characteristics was associated with a younger age of onset, an increased incidence of myoclonus at presentation, a positive family history but not with possession of APOE epsilon4 allele. An amnestic presentation (severe, yet circumscribed amnesia) was strongly associated with an older age of onset, a positive family history and the presence of APOE epsilon4 allele. Posterior cortical presentations showed a female bias, were typically sporadic, and showed no association with APOE epsilon4. The findings support the notion of phenotypic variation in AD, and show that genetic risk factors can influence clinical presentation. The findings draw att…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cortical myoclonus is documented in about 50% of patients with fvAD, and its presence favors fvAD over bvFTD.
“As cortical myoclonus is documented in about 50% of patients with fvAD, [28] its presence favors fvAD over bvFTD.”
From Diagnosing the frontal variant of Alzheimer’s disease: a clinician’s yellow brick road (2017) · cites this paper as [28]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 69 · Cited by 254
- Authors
- Snowden, J. S., Stopford, C. L., Julien, C. L., Thompson, J. C., Davidson, Y., Gibbons, L., Pritchard, A., Lendon, C. L., Richardson, A. M., Varma, A., Neary, D., & Mann, D. M. A.
- Affiliations
- Salford Royal Hospital (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Snowden, Julie S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 835-845
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014459814
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, cognitive phenotypes, clinical features, APOE ε4, family history (medicine), age of onset, amnesia, aphasia, visuospatial deficits, myoclonus, genetic risk factors, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Basal Ganglia Diseases, Cognition Disorders, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pedigree, Phenotype, Risk Factors, Age of Onset, Statistics, Nonparametric, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Apolipoprotein E4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review