Cited by 36Hemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Subcortical Transfer of Cognitive Information in Subjects With Complete Forebrain Commissurotomy

Open access
Cronin-Golomb, Alice·1986·Cortex

Abstract

Three complete commissurotomy subjects were tested for the ability to integrate cognitive information presented for a prolonged duration to opposite visual hemi-fields. A sample stimulus was projected to one hemi-field and a three-choice array to the other, with one choice related to the sample on an abstract or concrete basis. All subjects performed the non-verbal matching task at well above chance level, with scores comparable to those attained when the task was performed completely within one or the other hemisphere. Transfer was equally successful in the two directions, though the pathway originating in the right and terminating in the left hemisphere may be more sensitive to affective components of the stimulus. The information relayed subcortically is neither verbal nor imagic in nature, but appears to correspond to contextual or connotative associates of the stimulus. The results are discussed in terms of a cognitive system common to the two hemispheres and involving associational networks but not lateralized functions such as language and complex visuospatial processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-9452(86)80012-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although it has been proposed that callosotomy patients have the ability to transfer abstract information sub-cortically, there is substantial data to the contrary.

    “Although it has been proposed that callosotomy patients have the ability to transfer abstract information sub-cortically (Cronin-Golomb, 1986;Sergent, 1990), there is substantial data to the contrary (Corballis, 1994;Seymour et al., 1994;Kingstone and Gazzaniga, 1995).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 36

Authors
Cronin-Golomb, A.
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-12
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
499-519
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063098008
Cited by
36
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (1987-06-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5 T32 GM07737, T32GM007737)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 07003)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
commissurotomy, interhemispheric transfer, hemispheric integration, visual hemifield, hemispheric lateralization, associational networks
MeSH terms
Adult, Association, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Diencephalon, Dominance, Cerebral, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Reading, Telencephalon, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review