Cited by 18Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentBariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Body weight loss with phentermine alone versus phentermine and fenfluramine with very-low-calorie diet in an outpatient obesity management program: a retrospective study

Open access

Abstract

Background Obesity, which is epidemic in the United States, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The combination of diet, exercise, and a behavior-modification program often does not result in ideal body weight.Objective The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of phentermine (Phen) alone compared with phentermine plus fenfluramine (Phen-Fen), when used in combination with a very-low-calorie diet (VLCD) for weight loss in an outpatient obesity center.Methods We analyzed data collected at the UCLA outpatient University Obesity Center between 1993 and 1999. Data for patients who attended the center for at least 12 weeks and at least 4 visits, who were taking Phen or Phen-Fen, and whose body mass index (BMI) was ≥30 kg/m(2) were included in this retrospective study.Results During the study period, 3200 visits were recorded. Of 1133 potential participants, 446 patients were included in the analysis (309 women, 137 men; mean [SD] age, 46.7 [11.4] years; mean [SEM] body weight, 109.6 [26.7] kg; mean [SEM] BMI, 38.0 [7.6] kg/m(2)). Of these, 128 women and 60 men (mean [SEM] body weight at baseline, 103.4 [24.0] kg and 124.9 [28.2] kg, respectively) received Phen alone; 181 women and 77 men (mean [SEM] body weight at baseline, 102.5 [21.4] kg and 124.9 [30.2] kg, respectively) received Phen-Fen. No statistically significant differences were found between the Phen and Phen-Fen groups in mean age, body weight, or BMI for women or men at baseline. No significant differences in the time of weight loss were found when a VLCD was used with Phen alone compared with the Phen-Fen combination for either sex even at 12 weeks. For women, the mean total body weight loss was 7.4% in the Phen group and 8.7% in the Phen-Fen group, but these differences were not significant. For men, the mean total body weight loss was 7.8% in the Phen group and 8.2% in the Phen-Fen group, but these differences were not significant. No significant differences in BMI, severe adverse events, or dropout rate were found between the 2 treatment groups for men or women.Conclusions This outpatient study did not detect any significant difference between adjunctive uses of Phen compared with Phen-Fen pharmacotherapy when used with VLCD over 12 weeks. Phen can be used to achieve significant weight loss when combined with VLCD. The tolerability and positive physical response further suggest that Phen is a valuable medication for obesity management in the outpatient setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0011-393x(03)00126-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 18

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]7. Weintraub M. Long-term weight control: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute funded multimodal intervention study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1992;51:581-585.

Authors
Li, Z., Hong, K., Yip, I., Huerta, S., Bowerman, S., Walker, J., Wang, H., Elashoff, R., Go, V. L. W., & Heber, D.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Zhaoping
Venue
Current Therapeutic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
64
Issue
7
Pages
447-460
ISSN
0011-393X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074139737
Cited by
18
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Therapeutic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
obesity, weight loss, phentermine, fenfluramine, very low calorie diet, combination therapy, sex differences, body mass index, weight loss efficacy, appetite suppressants, behavior modification, diet and exercise, men's health, weight loss maintenance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review