CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison between nanofiltration and ozonation of biologically treated textile wastewater for its reuse in the industry

Bes-Piá, A., Mendoza-Roca, J.A., Roig-Alcover, L., Iborra-Clar, A., Iborra-Clar, M.I., Alcaina-Miranda, M.I.·2003·Desalination
DOI 10.1016/s0011-9164(03)00386-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0011-9164(03)00386-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Membrane separation may be preferred to ozonation as a post treatment to derive reusable water from secondary wastewater because ozonation would realize negligible conductivity removal.

    “Notwithstanding the disposal problem of reject stream emanating from membrane separation, it may be preferred to ozonation as a post treatment to derive reusable water from secondary wastewater, in view of the fact that the latter would realize negligible conductivity removal.27”

    From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [27]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. O'Neill, 1999, Anaerobic and aerobic treatment of a simulated textile effluent, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 74, 993, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199910)74:10<993::AID-JCTB142>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  2. Bes-Piá, 2002, Reuse of wastewater of the textile industry after its treatment with a combination of physico-chemical treatment and membrane technologies, Desalination, 149, 169, 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00750-6 · DOI
  3. Marcucci, 2002, Experimental campaigns on textile wastewater for reuse by means of different membrane processes, Desalination, 149, 137, 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00745-2 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Baig, 2001, Ozone treatment for biorefractory COD removal, Wat. Sci. Tech., 43, 197, 10.2166/wst.2001.0090 · DOI
  5. Perkowski, 1996, Application of ozone in textile wastewater treatment, Ozone: Sci. Eng., 18, 73, 10.1080/01919519608547342 · DOI
  6. Gahr, 1994, Ozonation — an important technique to comply with new German laws for textile wastewater treatment, Wat. Sci. Tech., 30, 255, 10.2166/wst.1994.0115 · DOI
  7. Ciardelli, 2001, Ozone treatment of textile wastewaters for reuse, Wat. Sci. Tech., 44, 61, 10.2166/wst.2001.0252 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bes-Piá, A., Mendoza-Roca, J. A., Roig-Alcover, L., Iborra-Clar, A., Iborra-Clar, M. I., & Alcaina-Miranda, M. I.
Venue
Desalination
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
157
Issue
1-3
Pages
81-86
ISSN
0011-9164
DOI
10.1016/s0011-9164(03)00386-2
Cited by
52
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review