Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterization of mineral population by index particle: Implication for the Stanton hypothesis

Wylie, A.G., Virta, R.L., Segreti, J.M.·1987·Environmental Research

Abstract

Fibers from seven crocidolite samples used by M. F. Stanton et al. (J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 67, 965-975 (1981] were measured from STEM and optical images. Their masses were computed. From these data, the population was normalized to a sample mass of 1 micrograms, and the number of fibers in various size categories of a 1-microgram sample was compared to the tumor probability for each sample. The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate errors in and the utility of population characterization by index number (log of the number of particles longer than 8 micron with widths equal to or less than 0.25 micron) and (2) to review the Stanton hypothesis in view of this analysis. The study found that in most cases the index number is a reliable population parameter. However, index numbers between 0 and 2.5 cannot be obtained. Therefore, populations of mineral fibers will fall into two groups: those without index particles, which have indeterminant index numbers, and those with index numbers between 2.5 and 6.0. Within Stanton's populations that contain index particles, where y equals logit tumor probability and x equals index number, r equals 0.307 (insignificant). Where y equals tumor probability and x equals index number, r equals 0.503 (significant). The correlation coefficients are low enough to suggest the possibility that factors other than size and shape play a role in mineral fiber carcinogenicity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0013-9351(87)80043-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chamberlain, 1978, The cytotoxic effects of asbestos and other mineral dusts in tissue culture cell line, Brit. J. Exp. Pathol., 59, 183
  2. Stanton, 1981, Relation of particle dimension to carcinogenicity in amphibole asbestosis and other fibrous minerals, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 67, 965

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wylie, A. G., Virta, R. L., & Segreti, J. M.
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-08
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
427-439
ISSN
0013-9351
Cited by
26
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review