Cited by 110Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Neurobiological mechanisms by which nicotine mediates different types of anxiety

File, Sandra E., Cheeta, Survjit, Kenny, Paul J.·2000·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

The effects of nicotine administration into the dorsal hippocampus and lateral septum provide further evidence that different neurochemical and neuroanatomical substrates control behaviour in different animal tests. Thus, in the social interaction test (a model of generalised anxiety disorder), bilateral administration of nicotine (1-4 microg) into both regions has anxiogenic effects in test conditions that generate moderate anxiety. The anxiogenic effects are mediated by a nicotine-evoked increase in 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) release and are reversed by co-administration of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, N-(2-(6-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl)ethyl)-N-(2-pyridyl)-cyclohex -ane carboxamide trichloride (WAY 100,635). On trial 1 in the elevated plus-maze (which models the escape components of panic disorder), nicotine is without effect when administered to the dorsal hippocampus, but has anxiogenic effects after lateral septal administration. On trial 2 in the elevated plus-maze (a model of specific phobia), nicotine (1 microg) has anxiolytic effects when administered to the dorsal hippocampus, but is ineffective (4 and 8 microg) in the lateral septum.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00889-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nicotine produces both anxiety-reducing and anxiety-increasing effects in rodents.

    “Nicotine is known to have both anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects in rodents (File et al. 2000)”

    From Mechanisms of Nicotine Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as File et al. 2000

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 50 · Cited by 110

Authors
File, S. E., Cheeta, S., & Kenny, P. J.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
File, Sandra E.
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
393
Issue
1-3
Pages
231-236
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995041225
Cited by
110
References
50
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
nicotine, anxiety, dorsal hippocampus, lateral septum, 5-hydroxytryptamine release, 5-HT1A receptor, WAY-100635, anxiogenic effects, anxiolytic effects, social interaction test, elevated plus maze, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, specific phobia, neuroanatomical substrates
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Hippocampus, Interpersonal Relations, Mecamylamine, Nicotine, Receptors, Serotonin, Septal Nuclei, Serotonin Antagonists, Nicotinic Agonists, Nicotinic Antagonists, Maze Learning, Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT1, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review