Cited by 64Nerve injury and regenerationRNA Research and SplicingPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Increased expression and localization of the RNA-binding protein HuD and GAP-43 mRNA to cytoplasmic granules in DRG neurons during nerve regeneration☆

Anderson, K.D., Merhege, M.A., Morin, M., Bolognani, F., Perrone-Bizzozero, N.I.·2003·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

The neuronal-specific RNA-binding protein, HuD, binds to a U-rich regulatory element of the 3' untranslated region (3' UTR) of the GAP-43 mRNA and delays the onset of its degradation. We have recently shown that overexpression of HuD in embryonic rat cortical cells accelerated the time course of normal neurite outgrowth and resulted in a twofold increase in GAP-43 mRNA levels. Given this evidence, we sought to investigate the involvement of HuD during nerve regeneration. It is known that HuD protein and GAP-43 mRNA are expressed in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) of adult rat and that GAP-43 is upregulated in DRG neurons during regeneration. In this study, we examined the expression patterns and levels of HuD and GAP-43 mRNA in DRG neurons following sciatic nerve injury using a combination of in situ hybridization, immunocytochemistry, and quantitative RT-PCR. GAP-43 and HuD expression increased in the ipsilateral DRG during the first 3 weeks of regeneration, with peak values seen at 7 days postcrush. At this time point, the levels of HuD and GAP-43 mRNAs in the ipsilateral DRG increased by twofold and sixfold, respectively, relative to the contralateral DRG. Not only were the temporal patterns of expression of HuD protein and GAP-43 mRNA similar, but also they were found to colocalize in the cytoplasm of DRG neurons. Moreover, both molecules were distributed in cytoplasmic granules containing ribosomal RNA. In conclusion, our results suggest that HuD is involved in the upregul…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0014-4886(03)00103-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 64

Authors
Anderson, K. D., Merhege, M. A., Morin, M., Bolognani, F., & Perrone-Bizzozero, N. I.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
183
Issue
1
Pages
100-108
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052483187
Cited by
64
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10rr014668-01, 5p20rr011830-03)
  • National Cancer Institute (R24CA088339, R24CA88339)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 30255)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20 RR 11830, S10 RR 14668)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
HUD, GAP-43, nerve regeneration, dorsal root ganglion neurons, sciatic nerve injury, RNA-binding proteins, mRNA localization, cytoplasmic granules, 3' untranslated region, mRNA stability, neurite outgrowth, peripheral nerve repair
MeSH terms
Animals, Cytoplasmic Granules, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Nerve Crush, Nerve Regeneration, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, RNA, Messenger, Sciatic Nerve, Time Factors, RNA-Binding Proteins, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, In Situ Hybridization, GAP-43 Protein, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Rats, ELAV Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review