Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ENO1 gene product binds to the c‐ myc promoter and acts as a transcriptional repressor: relationship with Myc promoter‐binding protein 1 (MBP‐1)

Feo, Salvatore, Arcuri, Daniela, Piddini, Eugenia, Passantino, Rosa, Giallongo, Agata·2000·FEBS Letters

Abstract

The Myc promoter‐binding protein‐1 (MBP‐1) is a 37–38 kDa protein that binds to the c‐ myc P2 promoter and negatively regulates transcription of the protooncogene. MBP‐1 cDNA shares 97% similarity with the cDNA encoding the glycolytic enzyme α‐enolase and both genes have been mapped to the same region of human chromosome 1, suggesting the hypothesis that the two proteins might be encoded by the same gene. We show here data indicating that a 37 kDa protein is alternatively translated from the full‐length α‐enolase mRNA. This shorter form of α‐enolase is able to bind the MBP‐1 consensus sequence and to downregulate expression of a luciferase reporter gene under the control of the c‐ myc P2 promoter. Furthermore, using α‐enolase/green fluorescent protein chimeras in transfection experiments we show that, while the 48 kDa α‐enolase mainly has a cytoplasmic localization, the 37 kDa α‐enolase is preferentially localized in the cell nuclei. The finding that a transcriptional repressor of the c‐ myc oncogene is an alternatively translated product of the ENO1 gene, which maps to a region of human chromosome 1 frequently deleted in human cancers, makes ENO1 a potential candidate for tumor suppressor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01494-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ENO1, as a moonlighting protein, performs multiple biological functions in cancer development, such as gene regulation, protein synthesis, cascade signalling pathway activation, immune responses, host-pathogen interactions, chemotherapy resistance, and cellular stress responses.

    “ENO1, as a moonlighting protein, performs multiple biological functions in cancer development”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90123-T · DOI
  2. 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.004113 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0959-437X(05)80339-9 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)60476-5 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/978-3-642-60801-8_1 · DOI
  6. 10.1074/jbc.274.27.19498 · DOI
  7. 10.1128/MCB.11.4.2154 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ray R.B., 1995, Cell Growth Differ., 6, 1089
  9. 10.1021/bi00010a036 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.83.18.6741 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb15611.x · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90496-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17932.x · DOI
  14. 10.1006/geno.1997.5186 · DOI
  15. 10.1006/geno.1996.4499 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20403.x · DOI
  17. 10.1128/MCB.15.11.5991 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/313493a0 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90188-K · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90217-5 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/nar/22.15.3259 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00210-3 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/0141-8130(91)90055-Y · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0378-1119(96)00693-2 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/MCB.19.4.2880 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0962-8924(99)01608-6 · DOI
  27. 10.1128/MCB.11.1.573 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/343662a0 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.86.20.7843 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/B978-0-12-152833-1.50007-1 · DOI
  31. 10.1074/jbc.272.9.5833 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/nar/25.2.362 · DOI
  33. 10.1042/bj2640671 · DOI
  34. 10.1083/jcb.118.4.859 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.8420004 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11982.x · DOI
  37. 10.1038/315688a0 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90956-2 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0014-4827(92)90099-T · DOI
  40. 10.1074/jbc.271.51.32529 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1128/jb.174.21.6789-6799.1992 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)82764-4 · DOI
  43. Weith A., 1995, Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 83, 113
  44. Ray R.B., 1995, Cancer Res., 55, 3747

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Feo, S., Arcuri, D., Piddini, E., Passantino, R., & Giallongo, A.
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-05
Volume
473
Issue
1
Pages
47-52
ISSN
  • 0014-5793
  • 1873-3468
Cited by
243
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review