The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Protein aggregation as bacterial inclusion bodies is reversible
Open accessAbstract
Inclusion bodies are refractile, intracellular protein aggregates usually observed in bacteria upon targeted gene overexpression. Since their occurrence has a major economical impact in protein production bio‐processes, in vitro refolding strategies are under continuous exploration. In this work, we prove spontaneous in vivo release of both β‐galactosidase and P22 tailspike polypeptides from inclusion bodies resulting in their almost complete disintegration and in the concomitant appearance of soluble, properly folded native proteins with full biological activity. Since, in particular, the tailspike protein exhibits an unusually slow and complex folding pathway involving deep interdigitation of β‐sheet structures, its in vivo refolding indicates that bacterial inclusion body proteins are not collapsed into an irreversible unfolded state. Then, inclusion bodies can be observed as transient deposits of folding‐prone polypeptides, resulting from an unbalanced equilibrium between in vivo protein precipitation and refolding that can be actively displaced by arresting protein synthesis. The observation that the formation of big inclusion bodies is reversible in vivo can be also relevant in the context of amyloid diseases, in which deposition of important amounts of aggregated protein initiates the pathogenic process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges
Rosano, G. L., & Ceccarelli, E. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172 · Cited by 2,556
Advanced genetic strategies for recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli
Sørensen, H. P., & Mortensen, K. K. (2005) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.08.004 · Cited by 963
Uversky, V. N. (2017) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2016.10.015 · Cited by 707
Protein quality in bacterial inclusion bodies
Ventura, S., & Villaverde, A. (2006) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.02.007 · Cited by 381
Self-citationProtein aggregation in recombinant bacteria: biological role of inclusion bodies
Villaverde, A., & Mar Carrió, M. (2003) · Biotechnology Letters · doi:10.1023/a:1025024104862 · Cited by 345
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrió, M. M., & Villaverde, A.
- Venue
- FEBS Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01-26
- Volume
- 489
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-33
- ISSN
- 0014-5793 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-3468
- OpenAlex
- W1966759409
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein aggregation as bacterial inclusion bodies is reversible. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02073-7
- The paper
- Carrió, M. M., & Villaverde, A. (2001). Protein aggregation as bacterial inclusion bodies is reversible. FEBS Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02073-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.