Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FTDP-17 mutations N279K and S305N in tau produce increased splicing of exon 10

Hasegawa, Masato, Smith, Michael J, Iijima, Masaaki, Tabira, Takeshi, Goedert, Michel·1999·FEBS Letters

Abstract

Missense mutations and intronic mutations in the tau gene cause frontotemporal dementia and Parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP‐17). Known missense mutations reduce the ability of tau to promote microtubule assembly. Intronic mutations lead to increased mRNA splicing of the alternatively spliced exon 10, resulting in an overproduction of tau isoforms with four microtubule‐binding repeats. We show here that the recently identified FTDP‐17 missense mutations N279K and S305N do not reduce the ability of tau to promote microtubule assembly. Instead they lead to increased splicing of exon 10, like the intronic mutations. The N279K and S305N mutations define a class of missense mutations in tau whose primary effects are at the RNA level.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01696-2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1002/ana.410430617 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7737 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/hmg/7.11.1825 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1998.tb00162.x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80615-7 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90210-9 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03390.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1021/bi00158a027 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.94.8.4113 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01217-4 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65721-5 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s004010050487 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1126/science.282.5395.1914 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13103 · DOI
  15. Iijima M. Tabira T. Poorkaj P. Schellenberg G.D. Trojanowski J.Q. Lee V.M.-Y. Schmidt M.L. Takahashi K. Nabika T. Matsumoto T. Yamashita Y. Yoshioka S. and Ishino H. (1999) NeuroReport (in press).
  16. 10.1101/gad.7.3.407 · DOI
  17. 10.1101/gad.7.12a.2405 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/1565 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01337-X · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90117-V · DOI
  21. 10.1097/00005072-199806000-00006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Hasegawa, M., Smith, M. J., Iijima, M., Tabira, T., & Goedert, M.
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-01-29
Volume
443
Issue
2
Pages
93-96
ISSN
  • 0014-5793
  • 1873-3468
Cited by
184
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review