The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of the novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing for ovulation inhibition
Open accessAbstract
Objective To assess the effects of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing on ovarian function.Design Randomized, open-label, crossover study.Setting Clinical pharmacology unit.Participant(s) Sixteen healthy female volunteers.Intervention(s) Group 1: one cycle of combined oral contraceptive containing desogestrel (150 microg) and ethinyl estradiol (30 microg) (desogestrel/EE COC), followed by a NuvaRing treatment period. Group 2: NuvaRing treatment period followed by a cycle of desogestrel/EE COC.Main outcome measure(s) Follicular diameter, serum hormone concentrations (follicle-stimulating hormone, 17beta estradiol, luteinizing hormone, and progesterone), and endometrial thickness.Result(s) NuvaRing use for the recommended period of 3 weeks resulted in complete inhibition of ovulation, as assessed by vaginal ultrasound (follicular diameter) and by serum luteinizing hormone and progesterone concentrations. Inhibition of ovulation was maintained for an additional 2 weeks of NuvaRing use. Ovarian suppression between the groups was comparable. Furthermore, ovarian suppression after 3 weeks of NuvaRing use was comparable to that on day 21 of DGS/EE COC intake. NuvaRing was well tolerated.Conclusion(s) NuvaRing completely inhibited ovulation throughout the normal 3-week period and the extended period of use. Ovarian suppression was comparable to that with desogestrel/EE COC.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Made two major changes to the original models (Harris Clark 2003 and Margolskee 2011) to simulate contraceptive behavior that is consistent with the biology.”
From A Survey of Mathematical Modeling of Hormonal Contraception and the Menstrual Cycle (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“In this new model, . P app limits early follicle development and is enhanced by E . 2”
From A Survey of Mathematical Modeling of Hormonal Contraception and the Menstrual Cycle (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: The pharmacodynamics and efficacy of Implanon®
Croxatto, H. B., & Mäkäräinen, L. (1998) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00118-8 · Cited by 188
RetractedTimmer, C. J., & Mulders, T. M. T. (2000) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200039030-00005 · Cited by 262
Self-citationClassification and comparison of oral contraceptives containing new generation progestogens
Newton (1995) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/1.3.231 · Cited by 57
Fotherby, K. (1995) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/0010-7824(94)00010-t · Cited by 57
Clinical experience and pharmacological effects of an oral contraceptive containing 20μg oestrogen
Fotherby, K. (1992) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/0010-7824(92)90151-i · Cited by 41
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stewart, S. A., Domínguez‐Robles, J., Donnelly, R. F., & Larrañeta, E. (2018) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym10121379 · Cited by 404
Examining menstrual tracking to inform the design of personal informatics tools
Epstein, D. A., Lee, N. B., Kang, J. H., Agapie, E., Schroeder, J., Pina, L. R., Fogarty, J., Kientz, J. A., & Munson, S. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025635 · Cited by 346
Why consider vaginal drug administration?
Alexander, N. J., Baker, E., Kaptein, M., Karck, U., Miller, L., & Zampaglione, E. (2004) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.025 · Cited by 269
Efficacy, Cycle Control, and User Acceptability of a Novel Combined Contraceptive Vaginal Ring
Dieben, T. O. M., Roumen, F. J. M. E., & Apter, D. (2002) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02124-5 · Cited by 249
Self-citationBjarnadóttir, R. I., Tuppurainen, M. T., & Killick, S. R. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2002.121103 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Mulders, T. M. T., & Dieben, T. O. M.
- Affiliations
- Organon (Netherlands) (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Dieben, Thom O.M
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 865-870
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158600879
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 15.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Keywords
- NuvaRing, vaginal ring, combined oral contraceptives, ovulation inhibition, ovarian suppression, desogestrel, ethinyl estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, follicle size, endometrial thickness
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Contraceptive Devices, Female, Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic, Endometrium, Ethinyl Estradiol, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Ovarian Follicle, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Ovulation, Progesterone, Time Factors, Ultrasonography, Vinyl Compounds, Desogestrel, Cross-Over Studies, Estradiol Congeners
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review