Monitoring technologist reading skills in a sperm morphology quality control program
Open accessAbstract
Objective The value of sperm morphology as a predictor of a man's fertilizing potential has often been challenged because of different classification systems used to distinguish between normal and abnormal spermatozoa. The study aimed to monitor the reading skills of 53 laboratory technologists who are enrolled in a continuous quality control program for sperm morphology assessment. Design Prospective analytical study. Settings Academic hospital and academic institution setting. Patient(s) Sperm samples from the sperm donor program and andrology technicians from sub-Saharan Africa. Intervention(s) Papanicolaou-stained sperm slides were prepared and shipped on a quarterly basis to participating laboratories. Papanicolaou-prestained sperm morphology slides were used as test material for 21 months. Main outcome measure(s) Percentage normal spermatozoa.A new statistical model was developed to record reading skills of the participating technicians. Reading skills were classified as marginal (5.7% of cases), good (11.3% of cases), and excellent (83% of cases). Result(s) Participants maintained their morphological reading skills and agreed with the reference laboratory by not exceeding a SD limit of 0.2 to set stringent standards for the program. Conclusion(s) Technician proficiency can be monitored using the results of a quality control program. A continuous quality control program can be initiated only after intensive training, because baseline values at the onset of the quality c…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sperm morphology assessment remains subjective to inter- and intra-laboratory differences.
“While sperm morphology is guided by specific criteria, it still remains subjective to inter- and intra-laboratory differences.4”
From Men with a complete absence of normal sperm morphology exhibit high rates of success without assisted reproduction (2017) · cites this paper as [4]
Cites
The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria
Menkveld, R., Stander, F. S. H., Kotze, T. J. V., Kruger, T. F., & Zyl, J. A. V. (1990) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137150 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smith, R., Kovac, J., Cajipe, M., Lamb, D., & Lipshultz, L. (2017) · Asian Journal of Andrology · doi:10.4103/1008-682x.189211 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Isolated abnormal strict morphology is not a contraindication for intrauterine insemination
Lockwood, G. M., Deveneau, N. E., Shridharani, A. N., Strawn, E. Y., & Sandlow, J. I. (2015) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12098 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Sperm morphology: classification drift over time and clinical implications
Morbeck, D. E., Leonard, P. H., Weaver, A. L., Shimek, K. M., Bouwsma, E. V. A., & Coddington, C. C. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.036 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Franken, D. R., Menkveld, R., Kruger, T. F., Sekadde-Kigondu, C., & Lombard, C.
- Affiliations
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Franken, Daniel R
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 79
- Pages
- 1637-1643
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160688143
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Keywords
- sperm morphology, sperm morphology assessment, continuous quality control, reading skills, fertilizing potential
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Quality Control, Spermatozoa, Clinical Laboratory Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review