Cited by 28Sperm and Testicular FunctionClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlReproductive Health and Technologies

Monitoring technologist reading skills in a sperm morphology quality control program

Open access
Franken, Daniel R, Menkveld, Roelof, Kruger, Thinus F, Sekadde-Kigondu, Christine, Lombard, Carl·2003·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective The value of sperm morphology as a predictor of a man's fertilizing potential has often been challenged because of different classification systems used to distinguish between normal and abnormal spermatozoa. The study aimed to monitor the reading skills of 53 laboratory technologists who are enrolled in a continuous quality control program for sperm morphology assessment. Design Prospective analytical study. Settings Academic hospital and academic institution setting. Patient(s) Sperm samples from the sperm donor program and andrology technicians from sub-Saharan Africa. Intervention(s) Papanicolaou-stained sperm slides were prepared and shipped on a quarterly basis to participating laboratories. Papanicolaou-prestained sperm morphology slides were used as test material for 21 months. Main outcome measure(s) Percentage normal spermatozoa.A new statistical model was developed to record reading skills of the participating technicians. Reading skills were classified as marginal (5.7% of cases), good (11.3% of cases), and excellent (83% of cases). Result(s) Participants maintained their morphological reading skills and agreed with the reference laboratory by not exceeding a SD limit of 0.2 to set stringent standards for the program. Conclusion(s) Technician proficiency can be monitored using the results of a quality control program. A continuous quality control program can be initiated only after intensive training, because baseline values at the onset of the quality c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00367-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franken, D. R., Menkveld, R., Kruger, T. F., Sekadde-Kigondu, C., & Lombard, C.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
Corresponding author
Franken, Daniel R
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
79
Pages
1637-1643
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160688143
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
sperm morphology, sperm morphology assessment, continuous quality control, reading skills, fertilizing potential
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Quality Control, Spermatozoa, Clinical Laboratory Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review