Cited by 50Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesMale Reproductive Health Studies

The Clinical Interpretation of 1000 Semen Analyses Among Applicants for Sterility Studies

Open access
Page, Ernest W., Houlding, Florence·1951·Fertility and Sterility

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)30483-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Page, E. W., & Houlding, F.
Affiliations
American Society for Reproductive Medicine (US)
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1951-03
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
140-151
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346915640
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
semen analysis, male infertility, semen quality, clinical interpretation
MeSH terms
Humans, Infertility, Male, Semen, Semen Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review