Comparison of techniques for selection of motile spermatozoa
Open accessAbstract
Procedures to separate motile sperm with high rates of recovery may have clinical application in in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination in increasing the probability of fertilization by a normal sperm and subsequent normal embryonic development. A two-step continuous Percoll gradient was an effective means of separating motile sperm which also had enhanced ability to penetrate zona-free hamster ova. However, the requirement for a high-speed centrifuge and rotor makes the procedure impractical in many cases. A one-step discontinuous Percoll gradient was also effective in separating a population of motile sperm. Comparison of the discontinuous Percoll gradient with other techniques for separation of motile sperm indicated the discontinuous Percoll gradient had advantages in terms of recovery, enhancement of motility, and increased ability to penetrate zona-free hamster ova. The velocity of selected sperm was not significantly different among techniques. The one-step discontinuous Percoll gradient appears to have value both for increasing homogeneity of human sperm populations used for basic research and in clinical practice for male subfertility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies have limited their investigation to sperm quality after processing for IUI.
“Recent studies have limited their investigation to sperm quality after processing for IUI (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23).”
From Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm (1999) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dickey, R. P., Pyrzak, R., Lu, P. Y., Taylor, S. N., & Rye, P. H. (1999) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00519-6 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Sperm creatine kinase activity in fertile and infertile oligospermic men
HUSZAR, G., VIGUE, L., & CORRALES, M. (1990) · Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.1990.tb01574.x · Cited by 103 · see citing works
SBRACIA, M., SAYME, N., GRASSO, J., VIGUE, L., & HUSZAR, G. (1996) · Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.1996.tb00587.x · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Berger, T., Marrs, R. P., & Moyer, D. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- ORCID
- Berger, Trish
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1985-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 268-273
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2401023482
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 8.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (5R23HD16306, 7R28HD18892)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Keywords
- Percoll density gradient, sperm separation, sperm motility, sperm penetration, in vitro fertilization, intrauterine insemination, male subfertility, sperm recovery
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Separation, Centrifugation, Density Gradient, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Cricetinae, Humans, Male, Sperm Head, Sperm Motility, Sperm-Ovum Interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review