Cited by 164Sperm and Testicular FunctionClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlReliability and Agreement in Measurement

Internal quality control of semen analysis

Open access
Cooper, Trevor G., Neuwinger, Jochen, Bahrs, Sabine, Nieschlag, Eberhard·1992·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To test a scheme for quality control of semen analysis. Design The reproducibility of assessment of sperm concentration, motility, and morphology was obtained for the same sample measured by different technicians (between or intertechnician variation) and for different samples assessed by each technician with time (within or intratechnician variation). Setting Andrology Laboratory. Patients Semen samples were analyzed from all patients attending the clinic. Interventions None. Main outcome measures Within technician and between technician coefficients of variation for concentration, motility, and morphology. Results When 100 sperm were routinely assessed, both intratechnician variation, as assessed from the precision of duplicate measurements, and intertechnician variation revealed hyperbolic curves with increasing variation at low percentages (less than 20) of motile or morphological forms. When these low values were excluded, mean intratechnician variations were 5.0%, 8.4%, and 2.8% for concentration, motility, and morphology, respectively, and mean intertechnician variations were, respectively, 6.1%, 5.6%, and 5.6%. Similar mean intertechnician variation for morphology was obtained for repeated assessment of prestained (7.3%) or presmeared (5.9%) slides. The use of cryopreserved semen to monitor longitudinal changes in the technicians' assessments revealed variations of 8.1% to 12% in concentration and 9.7% to 14% in motility. Computing the monthly means for sper…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55156-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, T. G., Neuwinger, J., Bahrs, S., & Nieschlag, E.
Affiliations
University of Münster (DE)
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-07
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
172-178
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2411902522
Cited by
164
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
semen analysis, internal quality control, sperm concentration, sperm motility, sperm morphology, andrology laboratory, frozen semen
MeSH terms
Humans, Male, Quality Control, Semen, Semen Preservation, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, World Health Organization, Cryopreservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review