Deep endometriosis: a consequence of infiltration or retraction or possibly adenomyosis externa?
Open accessAbstract
Objective To analyze the incidence and occurrence of subtypes of deep endometriosis.Design Deep endometriotic lesions (> 5 mm) were retrospectively analyzed, using our data base and slides taken systematically during surgery.Setting University Hospital Gasthuisberg (University of Leuven) which is a referral center for infertility and endoscopic surgery.Patients All women with deep endometriosis (n = 136) were selected from a consecutive series of 1,252 laparoscopies for infertility, pain, or both.Interventions and main outcome measurements Deep endometriosis was excised by CO2 laser and the depth of infiltration and the pelvic area measured. As part of an ongoing study, most lesions were photographed.Results Deep endometriosis is suggested to contain three subgroups. Type I is conical shaped and suggested to be formed by infiltration. Type II is deeply located and covered by extensive adhesions and probably formed by retraction. Type III is a spherical nodule with its largest dimension under the peritoneum. Types I, II, and III are found in 4.1%, 0.8%, and 0.9% of women with infertility (n = 759) and in 10.4%, 3.2%, and 3.2% of women with pelvic pain (n = 374). Types I, II, and III are most frequently found in the revised American Fertility Society classes II, III to IV, and I, respectively.Conclusions Three subtypes of deep endometriosis can be distinguished. Type III, which is a spherical nodule located in the recto vaginal septum is the most severe and largest lesion. This is, however, easily missed clinically because these lesions are generally scored as revised American Fertility Society class I.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because glandular activity was more in phase (~75%) with the menstrual cycle at depths >5 mm, deep endometriosis was defined as lesions >5 mm in the peritoneum.
“Because the glandular activity was more in phase (%75%) with the menstrual cycle at depths >5 mm deep endometriosis was defined as lesions >5 mm in the peritoneum (12).”
From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 345
- Authors
- Koninckx, P. R., & Martin, D. C.
- Affiliations
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- ORCID
- Martin, Dan C.
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 924-928
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W198775781
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Keywords
- deep infiltrating endometriosis, endometriosis subtypes, infertility, pelvic pain, endometriosis classification, rectovaginal septum, CO2 laser excision, adhesion
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Pain, Palpation, Retrospective Studies, Laser Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review