Cited by 345Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Deep endometriosis: a consequence of infiltration or retraction or possibly adenomyosis externa?

Open access
Koninckx, Philippe R., Martin, Dan C.·1992·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To analyze the incidence and occurrence of subtypes of deep endometriosis.Design Deep endometriotic lesions (> 5 mm) were retrospectively analyzed, using our data base and slides taken systematically during surgery.Setting University Hospital Gasthuisberg (University of Leuven) which is a referral center for infertility and endoscopic surgery.Patients All women with deep endometriosis (n = 136) were selected from a consecutive series of 1,252 laparoscopies for infertility, pain, or both.Interventions and main outcome measurements Deep endometriosis was excised by CO2 laser and the depth of infiltration and the pelvic area measured. As part of an ongoing study, most lesions were photographed.Results Deep endometriosis is suggested to contain three subgroups. Type I is conical shaped and suggested to be formed by infiltration. Type II is deeply located and covered by extensive adhesions and probably formed by retraction. Type III is a spherical nodule with its largest dimension under the peritoneum. Types I, II, and III are found in 4.1%, 0.8%, and 0.9% of women with infertility (n = 759) and in 10.4%, 3.2%, and 3.2% of women with pelvic pain (n = 374). Types I, II, and III are most frequently found in the revised American Fertility Society classes II, III to IV, and I, respectively.Conclusions Three subtypes of deep endometriosis can be distinguished. Type III, which is a spherical nodule located in the recto vaginal septum is the most severe and largest lesion. This is, however, easily missed clinically because these lesions are generally scored as revised American Fertility Society class I.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55436-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because glandular activity was more in phase (~75%) with the menstrual cycle at depths >5 mm, deep endometriosis was defined as lesions >5 mm in the peritoneum.

    “Because the glandular activity was more in phase (%75%) with the menstrual cycle at depths >5 mm deep endometriosis was defined as lesions >5 mm in the peritoneum (12).”

    From Pathogenesis of deep endometriosis (2017) · cites this paper as [12]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 345

Authors
Koninckx, P. R., & Martin, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-11
Volume
58
Issue
5
Pages
924-928
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W198775781
Cited by
345
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
deep infiltrating endometriosis, endometriosis subtypes, infertility, pelvic pain, endometriosis classification, rectovaginal septum, CO2 laser excision, adhesion
MeSH terms
Aging, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Pain, Palpation, Retrospective Studies, Laser Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review