The sperm deformity index: a reliable predictor of the outcome of oocyte fertilization in vitro
Open accessAbstract
Objective To evaluate a novel expression of sperm morphological parameters, the sperm deformity index, as a predictor of fertilization in vitro. Design Prospective blind clinical trial. Setting Academic tertiary referral center. Intervention(s) Detailed sperm morphological assessment applying strict morphological criteria and a multiple entry technique for an unselected male population undergoing IVF. The sperm deformity index, defined as the average number of deformities per sperm assessed, was calculated. Patient(s) One hundred fifty-eight patients undergoing IVF treatment. Females with conditions negatively influencing fertilization were excluded. Main outcome measure(s) Fertilization rates and pregnancy. Result(s) Seventy-three percent of patients achieved fertilization. Patients achieving fertilization had a significantly higher median proportion of normal forms and a significantly lower median sperm deformity index than the nonfertilizers. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves identified cutoff points that maximized the sum of sensitivity and specificity at sperm deformity index 1.6 and normal forms 4%. The sperm deformity index had a greater sensitivity (96%), specificity (72%), positive predictive value (90%), and negative predictive value (86%) than the proportion of normal sperm morphology (87%, 69%, 89%, 66%, respectively) at the optimal cutoff points. The area under the ROC curve was greater for the sperm deformity index (0.875) than for the proportion…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A low correlation between the SDI and the risk of complete failure of fertilisation by conventional IVF was found.
“A low correlation between the SDI and the risk of complete failure of fertilisation by conventional IVF was found [72].”
From Recommendations for Human Sperm Morphology Assessment in 2025: An Expert Review From the French BLEFCO Group (2026) · cites this paper as [72]
Cites
The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria
Menkveld, R., Stander, F. S. H., Kotze, T. J. V., Kruger, T. F., & Zyl, J. A. V. (1990) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137150 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hauser, R., Yogev, L., Botchan, A., Lessing, J. B., Paz, G., & Yavetz, H. (2001) · Andrologia · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0272.2001.00404.x · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Gatimel, N., Barbotin, A., Mery, L., Beauvillard, D., Bendayan, M., Boursier, A., Boueilh, T., Pereira, B., Chammas, J., Jacquet, J., et al. (2026) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.70134 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aziz, N., Buchan, I., Taylor, C., Kingsland, C. R., & Lewis-Jones, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- ORCID
- Buchan, Iain
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1000-1008
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W19512496
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Keywords
- sperm morphology, in vitro fertilization, male infertility, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, pregnancy outcomes, sperm quality assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fertilization, Fertilization in Vitro, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Oocytes, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review