Appraisal of the efficacy of artificial insemination with husband’s sperm and evaluation of insemination technics
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Standards for acceptable initial sperm quality, before processing for IUI, have not been established.
“Although IUI has been used since 1957 (3), standards for acceptable initial sperm quality, before processing for IUI, have not been established.”
From Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm (1999) · cites this paper as [3]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dickey, R. P., Pyrzak, R., Lu, P. Y., Taylor, S. N., & Rye, P. H. (1999) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00519-6 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mastroianni, L., Laberge, J. L., & Rock, J.
- ORCID
- Rock, J.
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1957-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 260-266
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2421616617
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Keywords
- artificial insemination, intrauterine insemination, insemination technique, male infertility
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Insemination, Artificial, Male, Spermatozoa, Spouses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
