Cited by 138Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive Health and Technologies

Failure of oocyte activation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection using round-headed sperm

Open access
Battaglia, David E., Koehler, James K., Klein, Nancy A., Tucker, Michael J.·1997·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To examine the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with round-headed sperm (globozoospermia). Design Retrospective analysis. Setting In vitro fertilization laboratory with extensive ICSI experience. Patient(s) A patient couple with infertility because of globozoospermia seeking ICSI treatment. Main outcome measure(s) Fertilization, cleavage, and pregnancy rates. Intervention(s) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and calcium ionophore. Result(s) This couple experienced only 7% fertilization after ICSI in their first cycle. Treatment of the unfertilized oocytes with calcium ionophore 20 hours after ICSI-induced fertilization and cleavage of 70% of the oocytes. Embryo quality was fair to good. On the second cycle, 8 of the injected oocytes were treated with ionophore immediately after ICSI and the remaining 20 oocytes were untreated. Normal fertilization was achieved in 75% of the treated and 10% of the untreated oocytes. Treatment of these unfertilized oocytes with ionophore 20 hours after ICSI resulted in fertilization in 73%. Pregnancy was not achieved after either ICSI cycle. Ultrastructural analysis indicated multiple structural abnormalities in the sperm. Conclusion(s) These results indicate that the round-headed sperm from this patient were incapable of oocyte activation after ICSI. This may be the reason for the frequent ICSI fertilization failure seen with this condition. Current ICSI procedures may not always overcome the infertility associated w…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81486-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 18 · Cited by 138

Authors
Battaglia, D. E., Koehler, J. K., Klein, N. A., & Tucker, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-07
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
118-122
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969150786
Cited by
138
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
globozoospermia, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, oocyte activation, fertilization failure, calcium ionophore, male infertility, fertilization rate, cleavage
MeSH terms
Calcimycin, Adult, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Infertility, Male, Ionophores, Male, Microinjections, Oocytes, Retrospective Studies, Spermatozoa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review