The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Initial experiments with the cross impact matrix method of forecasting
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 · Cited by 6,061
Cited by
Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide
Börjeson, L., Höjer, M., Dreborg, K.-H., Ekvall, T., & Finnveden, G. (2006) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.002 · Cited by 1,421
Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences
Landeta, J. (2006) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.002 · Cited by 1,353
Amer, M., Daim, T. U., & Jetter, A. (2013) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003 · Cited by 1,015
Towards systemic and contextual priority setting for implementing the 2030 Agenda
Weitz, N., Carlsen, H., Nilsson, M., & Skånberg, K. (2018) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-017-0470-0 · Cited by 573
The methodological worth of the Delphi forecasting technique
Hill, K. Q., & Fowles, J. (1975) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/0040-1625(75)90057-8 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Gordon, T. J., & Hayward, H.
- Venue
- Futures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1968-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 100-116
- ISSN
- 0016-3287 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985740849
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Initial experiments with the cross impact matrix method of forecasting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0016-3287(68)80003-5
- The paper
- Gordon, T. J., & Hayward, H. (1968). Initial experiments with the cross impact matrix method of forecasting. Futures. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-3287(68)80003-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
