The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support
Walker, W. E., Harremoës, P., Rotmans, J., van der Sluijs, J. P., van Asselt, M. B. A., Janssen, P., & Krayer von Krauss, M. P. (2003) · Integrated Assessment · doi:10.1076/iaij.4.1.5.16466 · Cited by 2,067
What to do when Stakeholders matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques
Bryson, J. M. (2004) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722 · Cited by 1,426
Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide
Börjeson, L., Höjer, M., Dreborg, K.-H., Ekvall, T., & Finnveden, G. (2006) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.002 · Cited by 1,421
The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning
Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Van Der Heijden, K. (2005) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003 · Cited by 1,204
Usage impact on data center electricity needs: A system dynamic forecasting model
Koot, M., & Wijnhoven, F. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116798 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlange, L. E.
- Venue
- Futures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 877-880
- ISSN
- 0016-3287 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068314534
- Cited by
- 1,938
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0016-3287(97)90139-7
- The paper
- Schlange, L. E. (1997). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. Futures. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-3287(97)90139-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
