The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Targeted Delivery of Linaclotide to Specific Areas of The Intestine Affects Clinical Efficacy in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A preliminary RCT of targeted colonic delivery of linaclotide in patients with IBS-C demonstrated pain relief, without effects on constipation.
“A preliminary RCT of targeted colonic delivery of linaclotide in patients with IBS-C demonstrated pain relief, without effects on constipation”
From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [145]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ford, A. C., Sperber, A. D., Corsetti, M., & Camilleri, M. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31548-8 · Cited by 818
Metadata
- Authors
- Chey, W. D., Chamberlin, P., Bochenek, W., Tripp, K., Higgins, C. S., Omniewski, N., Fox, S. M., Hall, M., Hashash, A., Miller, M., O'Dea, C. R., & Currie, M.
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- S1314-S1315
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2607171225
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Keywords
- linaclotide, targeted drug delivery, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, intestinal motility, clinical efficacy, guanylate cyclase-C agonist
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review