Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 383

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AGA Technical Review on the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Diarrhea☆

FINE, K, SCHILLER, L·1999·Gastroenterology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70513-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Epidemiology of colonic symptoms and the irritable bowel syndrome

    Talley, N. J., Zinsmeister, A. R., van Dyke, C., & Melton, L. J. (1991) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(91)90717-y · Cited by 648 · cited 2×

    “In this literature search, several points became obvious: (1) properly designed epidemiological and outcome studies are scarce; (2) there is a lack of large, controlled studies of diagnostic techniques and empirical treatment; (3) most recommendations for evaluation and treatment are based on expert opinion, not evide…”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 383

Metadata

Authors
FINE, K., & SCHILLER, L.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-06
Volume
116
Issue
6
Pages
1464-1486
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103996201
Cited by
383
References
1
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AGA Technical Review on the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Diarrhea☆. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70513-5
The paper
FINE, K., & SCHILLER, L. (1999). AGA Technical Review on the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Diarrhea☆. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70513-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.