Cited by 234Geochemistry and Elemental AnalysisPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena

Remobilization of authigenic uranium in marine sediments by bioturbation

Zheng, Yan, Anderson, Robert F., van Geen, Alexander, Fleisher, Martin Q.·2002·Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0016-7037(01)00886-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, Y., Anderson, R. F., van Geen, A., & Fleisher, M. Q.
Affiliations
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Yan
Venue
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
66
Issue
10
Pages
1759-1772
ISSN
0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033294326
Cited by
234
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Keywords
authigenic uranium, uranium remobilization, bioturbation, marine sediment, bottom water oxygen, organic carbon flux, uranium diffusion, sediment traps, sediment-water interface, Northeast Pacific, Northwest Atlantic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review