Cited by 222Astro and Planetary ScienceOrigins and Evolution of LifeSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life

Nonracemic isovaline in the Murchison meteorite: chiral distribution and mineral association

Pizzarello, Sandra, Zolensky, Michael, Turk, Kendra A.·2003·Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0016-7037(02)01283-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unequal amounts of enantiomers were found in Murchison meteorite with a quasi-exclusive predominance for (S)-amino acids, ranging from 0 to 26.3 +/- 0.8% e.e. values, with the highest e.e. measured for non-proteinogenic alpha-methyl amino acids.

    “Unequal amounts of enantiomers were also found with a quasiexclusive predominance for (S)-amino acids 57,285,[438][439][440] ranging from 0 to 26.3 Æ 0.8% e.e. values (highest e.e. being measured for non-proteinogenic a-methyl amino acids), 441”
  • The high enantiomeric excesses detected for (S)-isovaline in certain stones of the Murchison meteorite, up to 15.2 +/- 0.2%, suggest that CPL alone cannot be at the origin of this enantioenrichment.

    “The high enantiomeric excesses detected for (S)-isovaline in certain stones of the Murchison's meteorite (up to 15.2 Æ 0.2%) suggested that CPL alone cannot be at the origin of this enantioenrichment.285”
  • There likely were biases in the inventory of compounds delivered to the Earth by comets and meteorites.

    “There likely were biases in the inventory of compounds delivered to the Earth by comets and meteorites (Cronin and Pizzarello 1997;Engel and Macko 1997;Pizzarello et al. 2003;Glavin and Dworkin 2009).”

    From Protocells and RNA Self-Replication (2018) · cites this paper as Pizzarello et al. 2003

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 31 · Cited by 222

Authors
Pizzarello, S., Zolensky, M., & Turk, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Pizzarello, Sandra
Venue
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
67
Issue
8
Pages
1589-1595
ISSN
0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991695179
Cited by
222
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Keywords
isovaline, Murchison meteorite, Murray meteorite, enantiomeric excess, carbon isotopes, meteoritic amino acids, circularly polarized light, hydrous silicates, meteorite mineralogy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review