The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemical catalysis of nitrate reduction by iron (II)
Open accessAbstract
Experiments have been conducted to investigate the chemical reduction of nitrate under conditions relevant to the often low organic carbon environment of groundwaters. At pH 8 and 20 ± 2°C, in the presence of Cu(II), NO3− was chemically reduced by Fe(II) to NH4+ with an average stoichiometric liberation of 8 protons. The rate of the reaction systematically increased with pH in the range pH 7–8.5. The half-life for nitrate reduction, t1/2, was inversely related to the total molar copper concentration, [CuT], by the equation log t1/2 = −1.35 log [CuT] −2.616, for all measured values of t1/2 from 23 min to 15 days. At the Cu(II) concentrations used of 7 × 10−6 −10−3 M, Cu was present mainly as a solid phase, either adsorbed to the surfaces of precipitated iron oxides or as a saturated solid. It is this solid phase copper rather than CU2+ in solution which is catalytically active. Neither magnetite, which was formed as a product of the reaction, nor freshly prepared lepidocrocite catalysed the reaction, but goethite did. Although traces of oxygen accelerated the reaction, at higher partial pressures (>0.01 atm) the reduction of nitrate was inhibited, probably due to competition between NO3− and O2 for Fe(II). Appreciable catalytic effects were also observed for solid phase forms of Ag(I), Cd(H), Ni(H), Hg(II), and Pb(II). Mn(II) enhanced the rate slightly, and there was evidence for slow abiotic reduction in the absence of any added metal catalysts. These results suggest that the chemical reduction of nitrate at catalytic concentrations and temperatures appropriate to groundwater conditions is feasible on a timescale of months to years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
New methods of nitrate removal from water
Shrimali, M., & Singh, K. P. (2001) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(00)00147-0 · Cited by 457
A mechanism of abiotic immobilization of nitrate in forest ecosystems: the ferrous wheel hypothesis
Davidson, E. A., Chorover, J., & Dail, D. B. (2003) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00592.x · Cited by 333
Microbial anaerobic Fe(II) oxidation – Ecology, mechanisms and environmental implications
Bryce, C., Blackwell, N., Schmidt, C., Otte, J., Huang, Y., Kleindienst, S., Tomaszewski, E., Schad, M., Warter, V., Peng, C., et al. (2018) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14328 · Cited by 294
Klueglein, N., & Kappler, A. (2013) · Geobiology · doi:10.1111/gbi.12019 · Cited by 261
Smirnov, A., Hausner, D., Laffers, R., Strongin, D. R., & Schoonen, M. A. (2008) · Geochemical Transactions · doi:10.1186/1467-4866-9-5 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Ottley, C. J., Davison, W., & Edmunds, W. M.
- Venue
- Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1819-1828
- ISSN
- 0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058943237
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical catalysis of nitrate reduction by iron (II). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0016-7037(97)00058-6
- The paper
- Ottley, C. J., Davison, W., & Edmunds, W. M. (1997). Chemical catalysis of nitrate reduction by iron (II). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7037(97)00058-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.