Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The reduction of chromium (VI) by iron (II) in aqueous solutions

Open access
Pettine, Maurizio, D’Ottone, Luca, Campanella, Luigi, Millero, Frank J., Passino, Roberto·1998·Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Abstract

The rates of the reduction of Cr(VI) with Fe(II) were measured in NaCl, NaClO4, and natural seawater as a function of pH (1.5–8.7), temperature (5–40°C) and ionic strength (I = 0.01–2 M). The pseudo first-order rate constant (log k1) showed a parabolic dependence on pH decreasing from 1.5 to 4.5 and increasing from 5.5 to 8.7. The kinetics of the reaction in these two regions of pH also showed different influences of temperature, ionic strength, and reductant concentration. The rate of Cr(VI) reduction is described by the general expression −d[Cr(VI)]/dt = k [Cr(VI)] [Fe(II)] where k (M−1 min−1) can be determined from the log k=6.74−1.01 pH−188.5/T for the pH range 1.5–4.5 (σ = 0.2) and log k=11.93+0.95 pH−4260.1/T−1.06 I0.5 for the pH range 5–8.7 (σ = 0.2) from 5 to 40°C and 0.01 to 2 M ionic strength. The effect of pH, temperature, and ionic strength on the reaction indicates that the reactions at low pH are due to H2CrO4+Fe2+→kH2A-Feproducts While the reactions at high pH are due to HCrO4−+FeOH+→kHA-FeOHproducts HCrO4−+Fe(OH)2→kHA-Fe(OH)2products The overall rate expression over the entire pH range can be determined from (H2A = H2CrO4) k=kH2A-Feα(H2A)α(Fe2+)+kHA-FeOHα(HA−)α(FeOH+)+kHA-Fe(OH)2α(HA−)α(Fe(OH)2) where kH2A−Fe = 5 x 106, kHA−FeOH = 1 x 106, kHA−Fe (OH)2= 5 x 1011. In oxic aqueous systems Cr(VI) competes with O2 in the oxidation of Fe(II) and an extension of the rate law for Cr(VI) reduction with Fe(II) in oxygenated solutions is proposed. The application of this extended rate law to environmental conditions suggests that this reaction influences the distribution of oxidized and reduced species of chromium in oxic and anoxic waters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0016-7037(98)00086-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 250

Metadata

Authors
Pettine, M., D’Ottone, L., Campanella, L., Millero, F. J., & Passino, R.
Venue
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
62
Issue
9
Pages
1509-1519
ISSN
0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989101325
Cited by
250
References
1
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The reduction of chromium (VI) by iron (II) in aqueous solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0016-7037(98)00086-6
The paper
Pettine, M., D’Ottone, L., Campanella, L., Millero, F. J., & Passino, R. (1998). The reduction of chromium (VI) by iron (II) in aqueous solutions. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7037(98)00086-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.