The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organic vs. conventional agriculture: knowledge, power and innovation in the food chain
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2006) · The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,506
POLANYI, M. (1997) · Knowledge in Organisations · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-x · Cited by 12,408
Technical Change and Economic Theory.
Swann, P., & Dosi, G. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234048 · Cited by 4,041
Lundvall, B.-Ä., & Johnson, B. (1994) · Journal of Industry Studies · doi:10.1080/13662719400000002 · Cited by 2,058
Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues
Freeman, C. (1991) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-x · Cited by 1,784
NATIONAL SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION
(2012) · The Economics of Industrial Innovation · doi:10.4324/9780203357637-26 · Cited by 1,380
Academic research and industrial innovation
Mansfield, E. (1991) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(91)90080-a · Cited by 1,262
Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations.
Downie, B., & Fox, A. (1975) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2521873 · Cited by 1,076
The Nature of the Innovative Process
Dosi, G. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 987
The spaces of actor-network theory
Murdoch, J. (1998) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/s0016-7185(98)00011-6 · Cited by 756
Self-citation
Cited by
Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review
Reed, M. S. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014 · Cited by 4,237
Šūmane, S., Kunda, I., Knickel, K., Strauss, A., Tisenkopfs, T., Rios, I. D. I., Rivera, M., Chebach, T., & Ashkenazy, A. (2018) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.020 · Cited by 749
The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in Metropolitan areas
Jarosz, L. (2008) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.10.002 · Cited by 653
Consumer/Producer Links in Fair Trade Coffee Networks
Raynolds, L. T. (2002) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00224 · Cited by 473
Coley, D., Howard, M., & Winter, M. (2009) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.11.001 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgan, K., & Murdoch, J.
- Venue
- Geoforum
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-173
- ISSN
- 0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016408892
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organic vs. conventional agriculture: knowledge, power and innovation in the food chain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0016-7185(99)00029-9
- The paper
- Morgan, K., & Murdoch, J. (2000). Organic vs. conventional agriculture: knowledge, power and innovation in the food chain. Geoforum. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7185(99)00029-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
