The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ecological modernization as social theory
Abstract
Abstract In this paper I examine some of the reasons for and implications of the ascendance of ecological modernization thought. I stress that its rapid rise to prominence is not because it is a well-developed and highly-codified social theory, but rather because it accords particularly well with a number of intellectual and broader political–economic factors, many of which lie outside the realms of sociology and environmental sociology. I suggest that while ecological modernization is indistinct as a social theory its basic logic suggests two points. First, the most sophisticated versions of ecological modernization revolve around the notion that political processes and practices are particularly critical in enabling ecological phenomena to be “ ‘moved into’ the modernization process” (Mol, A.P.J., 1995. The Refinement of Production. Van Arkel, Utrecht, p. 28). Thus, a full-blown theory of ecological modernization must ultimately be a theory of politics and the state. Second, the logic of ecological modernization theory suggests that it has very close affinities to several related literatures – particularly embedded autonomy, civil society, and state-society synergy theories in political sociology – which have not yet been incorporated into the ecological modernization literature. I conclude by arguing that ecological modernization can benefit by bringing these related – and, for that matter, more powerful – theories into its fold.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world
Sneddon, C., Howarth, R. B., & Norgaard, R. B. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.013 · Cited by 730
Jabbour, C. J. C., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., Sarkis, J., & Filho, M. G. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.010 · Cited by 576
Wong, C. W. Y., Lai, K.-H., Shang, K.-C., Lu, C.-S., & Leung, T. K. P. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.08.031 · Cited by 473
York, R., & Rosa, E. A. (2003) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026603256299 · Cited by 455
Li, Z., Huang, Z., & Su, Y. (2023) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106545 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Buttel, F. H.
- Venue
- Geoforum
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-65
- ISSN
- 0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071762763
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological modernization as social theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0016-7185(99)00044-5
- The paper
- Buttel, F. H. (2000). Ecological modernization as social theory. Geoforum. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7185(99)00044-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.