Anxiety and fear behaviors in adult male and female C57BL/6 mice are modulated by maternal separation
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of maternal separation in C57BL/6 male and female mice during infancy on later adult fear and anxiety behaviors. Additionally, we observed the maternal behavior of the dams to examine aspects of maternal care that may be modulated by daily bouts of separation. In males, mice that experienced maternal separation during the neonatal period displayed significantly higher levels of anxiety and fear behavior, as measured by the open field test and elevated plus maze, compared to control, standard facility reared males. In females, however, maternal separation reduced anxiety and fear behavior in the open field test, but only when the females were in the diestrous phase of their estrous cycle. The 30-min daily observation of the dams revealed that the separation did not significantly alter the frequency of the maternal care provided by the dam at the time point measured. These results indicate that the emotionality of adult male and female mice can be modulated by maternal separation. However, this effect is dependent on the sex of the offspring and the phase of the estrous cycle of the female.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maternal separation in rodent pups is associated with increased anxiety-like behaviors.
“Maternal separation in rodent pups is associated with greater LHPA axis reactivity (Moriceau et al., 2010), accelerated amygdala development (Moriceau and Sullivan, 2006, Ono et al., 2008), increased anxiety-like behaviors (Romeo et al., 2003), and more social instability in adulthood (Kikusui and Mori, 2009).”
From The impact of developmental timing for stress and recovery (2015) · cites this paper as Romeo et al., 2003
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 32 · Cited by 285
- Authors
- Romeo, R. D., Mueller, A., Sisti, H. M., Ogawa, S., McEwen, B. S., & Brake, W. G.
- Affiliations
- Rockefeller University (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Romeo, Russell D
- Venue
- Hormones and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 561-567
- ISSN
- 0018-506X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081621134
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 13.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- maternal separation, anxiety, fear behavior, sex differences, estrous cycle, maternal care, C57BL/6 mice, elevated plus maze, open field test, emotional development
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Adaptation, Psychological, Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Anxiety, Fear, Female, Male, Maternal Behavior, Maternal Deprivation, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Temperament, Estrous Cycle, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review