The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the measure of fuzziness and negation. II. Lattices
Open accessAbstract
We propose that the measure of fuzziness of a concept is related to the distinction between the concept and its negation. In this paper we are concerned with the situation in which our objects lie in a lattice. We introduce the lattice concept of betweenness to operationalize our definition. We investigate properties of this concept of fuzziness. We also discuss the related notion of negation in lattices in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Generalized Orthopair Fuzzy Sets
Yager, R. R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2016.2604005 · Cited by 2,251
Self-citationExtension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets
Zhang, X., & Xu, Z. (2014) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.21676 · Cited by 1,506
A novel intuitionistic fuzzy C means clustering algorithm and its application to medical images
Chaira, T. (2011) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2010.05.005 · Cited by 400
Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis in Engineering and the Sciences
Ayyub, B. M., & Klir, G. J. (2006) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420011456 · Cited by 371
Pal, N. R., & Bezdek, J. C. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/91.277960 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Yager, R. R.
- Venue
- Information and Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 236-260
- ISSN
- 0019-9958 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988794238
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the measure of fuzziness and negation. II. Lattices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0019-9958(80)90156-4
- The paper
- Yager, R. R. (1980). On the measure of fuzziness and negation. II. Lattices. Information and Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0019-9958(80)90156-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
