Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 23Statistical Mechanics and EntropyProbability and Statistical ResearchMulti-Criteria Decision Making

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The characterization of a measure of information discrepancy

Fang, Weiwu·2000·Information Sciences

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0020-0255(00)00008-6

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. W. Fang, A measure of information discrepancy and an application in the DNA study, Chinese Science Abstract (research Reports), vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1028–1029
  2. Nath, 1968, On the measures of errors in information, J. Math. Sci., 3, 1

Cited by

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Fang, W.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Fang, Weiwu
Venue
Information Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
125
Issue
1-4
Pages
207-232
ISSN
0020-0255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076805164
Cited by
23
References
17
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Information Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Keywords
multi-source data, Shannon entropy, characterization of functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.