Cited by 48Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Familial risk among Japanese patients with endometriosis

Kashima, K., Ishimaru, T., Okamura, H., Suginami, H., Ikuma, K., Murakami, T., Iwashita, M., Tanaka, K.·2004·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Objectives This study was designed to examine the prevalence of endometriosis among female siblings of patients with endometriosis in Japan. Methods A total of 339 patients with endometriosis were questioned about endometriosis in their sisters. The control group consisted of 284 Japanese healthy fertile women with no history of endometriosis. Similarly, the controls were interviewed about their sisters. Results We detected sisters with endometriosis in 8.8% of cases and 1.5% of the control population. The relative risk of endometriosis in female siblings was 5.7. However, a significant difference was not seen in age at diagnosis and clinical stage between patients with or without a family history of endometriosis. Conclusions These data demonstrate a familial tendency for endometriosis and suggest that endometriosis has a genetic factor in the pathogenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00340-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The self-reported family history rate in this sample (40%) is higher than rates reported in studies from Puerto Rico (20%), Brazil (8.9%), Japan (8.8%), and the US (8.1%).

    “This rate of family history is higher than what has been reported in other published studies of patients from Puerto Rico (20%) (31), Brazil (8.9%) (32), Japan (8.8%) (33), and the US (8.1%) (34).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 48

Authors
Kashima, K., Ishimaru, T., Okamura, H., Suginami, H., Ikuma, K., Murakami, T., Iwashita, M., & Tanaka, K.
Affiliations
  • Niigata University (JP)
  • Nagasaki University (JP)
  • Kumamoto University (JP)
  • Kyoto Medical Center (JP)
  • Takarazuka City Hospital (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Kyorin University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kashima, K.
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10-30
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
61-64
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
OpenAlex
W2003635697
Cited by
48
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, familial risk, sisters, family history (medicine), genetic susceptibility, prevalence, age at diagnosis, clinical stage, Japanese women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Japan, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Case-Control Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review