Cited by 121Trypanosoma species research and implicationsVector-borne infectious diseasesAnimal health and immunology

Immune responses of cattle to African trypanosomes: protective or pathogenic?

Open access
Taylor, K·1998·International Journal for Parasitology

Abstract

Trypanosomosis in domestic livestock negatively impacts food production and economic growth in many parts of the world, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Current methods of control are inadequate to prevent the enormous annual socio-economic losses resulting from this disease. Hope for a vaccine based on the variant surface glycoprotein coat was abandoned several years ago when the complexity of the parasite's antigenic repertoire was appreciated. As a result, research is now focused on identifying invariant trypanosome components as potential targets for interrupting infection or infection-mediated disease. The identification of immune mechanisms involved in parasite and disease control, or conversely those responses that are associated with a poor clinical outcome, should facilitate the search for vaccine candidates and subsequent vaccine design strategies. To this end, comparative studies on the immune responses of trypanotolerant and trypanosusceptible breeds of cattle can be exploited. These studies have revealed that trypanotolerant and trypanosusceptible breeds of cattle have distinct antibody responses. Trypanosusceptible cattle produce high titres of polyspecific IgM but fail to produce IgG to specific trypanosome antigens. In contrast, although T cell and macrophage/monocyte responses of infected cattle are depressed, significant differences have not been described between tolerant and susceptible breeds of cattle. In this review, isotype-dependent effector mechan…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0020-7519(97)00154-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 212 · Cited by 121

Authors
Taylor, K.
Affiliations
International Livestock Research Institute (KE)
Corresponding author
Taylor, K
Venue
International Journal for Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-02
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
219-240
ISSN
0020-7519 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042867369
Cited by
121
References
212
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal for Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Trypanosoma species research and implications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
Keywords
trypanosomiasis, cattle, African trypanosomes, trypanotolerance, breed differences, antibody response, IgM, IgG, T cell response, macrophage activation, complement activation, Fc receptors, phagocytosis, immune complexes, autoimmunity, cytokines, vaccine targets
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Disease Susceptibility, Immunity, Innate, Trypanosoma congolense, Trypanosomiasis, African, Variant Surface Glycoproteins, Trypanosoma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review