Cited by 51Food Drying and ModelingAgricultural Engineering and MechanizationHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media

Heat and Moisture Transfer in Ventilated Grain

Boyce, D.S.·1966·Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-8634(66)80033-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boyce, D. S.
Affiliations
University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez (PR)
Corresponding author
Boyce, D.S.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1966-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
255-265
ISSN
0021-8634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054829637
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Newcastle University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Drying and Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
Keywords
heat and moisture transfer, grain drying, grain moisture content, air humidity, grain cooling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review