The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cleavage of disulfide bonds in endocytosed macromolecules. A processing not associated with lysosomes or endosomes.
Open accessAbstract
Whereas there is biological evidence that the reductive cleavage of disulfide bonds is critical for the activation of endocytosed macromolecules such as toxins, immunotoxins, and other drug carriers, virtually nothing is known about the specifics of this cleavage. To study this process, a model compound was synthesized in which a radioiodinated tyramine was linked through a disulfide bond to an undegradable carrier, poly(D-lysine), known to be efficiently endocytosed. Cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells were pulse-labeled with this probe, and the disulfide cleavage was measured as released acid-soluble radioactivity at different times of chase. Pulse-labeled cells were also subjected to subcellular fractionation to identify intracellular structures associated with disulfide cleavage. Cleavage began without lag, amounted to about approximately 7% of the initial cell-bound radioactivity in the first hour and continued for more than 6 h. It was abolished in the presence of N-ethylmaleimide. When sulfhydryl groups present at the cell surface were blocked with cell-impermeant sulfhydryl reagent, the initial phase of disulfide cleavage was inhibited, indicating that cleavage began at the cell surface. A long-lasting intracellular phase of disulfide cleavage began after about approximately 30 min of chase. Subcellular fractionation and kinetic analysis indicated that neither lysosomes nor endosomes were participating in that phase, leaving the Golgi apparatus as the most probable site of endocytic disulfide cleavage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication, and evolution.
Strauss, J. H., & Strauss, E. G. (1994) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.58.3.491-562.1994 · Cited by 2,221
Saito, G., Swanson, J. A., & Lee, K.-D. (2003) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00179-5 · Cited by 1,407
Tat peptide-mediated cellular delivery: back to basics
BROOKS, H., LEBLEU, B., & VIVES, E. (2005) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2004.12.001 · Cited by 667
Leamon, C. (2004) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2004.01.008 · Cited by 558
Arunachalam, B., Phan, U. T., Geuze, H. J., & Cresswell, P. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.2.745 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Feener, E. P., Shen, W. C., & Ryser, H. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 265
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 18780-18785
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1562062833
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cleavage of disulfide bonds in endocytosed macromolecules. A processing not associated with lysosomes or endosomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)30580-x
- The paper
- Feener, E. P., Shen, W. C., & Ryser, H. J. (1990). Cleavage of disulfide bonds in endocytosed macromolecules. A processing not associated with lysosomes or endosomes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)30580-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.