The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cloning of two human liver bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase cDNAs with expression in COS-1 cells.
Open accessAbstract
We report the isolation and characterization of two human liver cDNA clones, HUG-Br1 and HUG-Br2; each encodes a UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzyme which glucuronidates bilirubin IX alpha to form both the IX alpha C8 and IX alpha C12 monoconjugates and a diconjugate. HUG-Br1 cDNA (2351 base pairs) and HUG-Br2 cDNA (2368 base pairs) encode proteins with 533 and 534 amino acid residues, respectively, with a typical membrane-insertion signal peptide, membrane-spanning domain, and 3 or 5 potential asparagine-linked glycosylation sites. At the nucleic acid and deduced amino acid sequence levels the two clones are 82% similar overall, 66% similar in the amino termini, and identical after codon 287, thus encoding proteins with the same carboxyl terminus. The mRNA encoding HUG-Br1 is of high abundance, and the one encoding HUG-Br2 is of low abundance; both are 2.6 kilobases in length. Both messages (2.6 kilobases) were present in the explanted liver of a Type I Crigler-Najjar patient, although the level for that of HUG-Br1 was reduced 4.5-fold. Northern blot analysis of poly(A)+ RNA isolated from the liver of an untreated and a phenobarbital-treated Erythrocebus patas monkey with 5'-specific probes for each clone indicated that the HUG-Br2-encoded message is induced two fold, but that for HUG-Br1 is not. These data indicate that bilirubin is glucuronidated by at least two different proteins, most likely present in very different amounts. These cDNAs which encode functional bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferases will allow the isolation of an appropriate gene to develop a gene therapy model for patients which have the totally deficient trait.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bosma, P. J., Chowdhury, J. R., Bakker, C., Gantla, S., de Boer, A., Oostra, B. A., Lindhout, D., Tytgat, G. N. J., Jansen, P. L. M., Elferink, R. P. J. O., et al. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199511023331802 · Cited by 1,447
Ritter, J. K., Chen, F., Sheen, Y. Y., Tran, H. M., Kimura, S., Yeatman, M. T., & Owens, I. S. (1992) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)50724-4 · Cited by 473
Self-citationStrassburg, C. P. (2010) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2010.07.007 · Cited by 184
Diagnostic criteria and contributors to Gilbert’s syndrome
Wagner, K.-H., Shiels, R. G., Lang, C. A., Seyed Khoei, N., & Bulmer, A. C. (2018) · Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · doi:10.1080/10408363.2018.1428526 · Cited by 138
Gallucci, G. M., Hayes, C. M., Boyer, J. L., Barbier, O., Assis, D. N., & Ghonem, N. S. (2024) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells13151296 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritter, J. K., Crawford, J. M., & Owens, I. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1043-1047
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1486575517
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cloning of two human liver bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase cDNAs with expression in COS-1 cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)35280-8
- The paper
- Ritter, J. K., Crawford, J. M., & Owens, I. S. (1991). Cloning of two human liver bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase cDNAs with expression in COS-1 cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)35280-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.