Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Isolation and characterization of gap junctions from rat liver.

Open access
Hertzberg, E.L., Gilula, N.B.·1979·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Cell to cell communication, through the transmission of small molecules (Mr less than 1200), probably occurs via a membrane specialization, the gap junction. A procedure has been developed for the isolation of gap junctions from rat liver without the use of exogenous proteases. Plasma membranes were prepared from 45 to 50 rat livers (about 500 g) by a procedure which provided a 10% yield with a lo-fold enrichment, based upon the recovery of B’nucleotidase. Nonjunctional membrane was removed from this preparation by solubilization with Sarkosyl NL-97. Washing with 0.1 M Na&Os removed the uricase which, along with collagen, was the major contaminant. Gap junctions, with a density of 1.165 g/cm3, were then isolated by sedimentation in sucrose gradients containing 1 M urea. A typical yield was 50 to 100 pg of protein. Morphologically, the gap junctions were characterized as septilaminar structures comprised of two membranes with an intervening 2 to 4 nm gap. These junctional plaques contained 8.5 nm diameter particles with a 9.0 nm center to center spacing. When negatively stained, a circular electron dense 1.5 to 2.0 nm region was observed in the center of these particles, possibly the site of small molecule transmission. Electrophoretic analysis of the gap junction fraction in sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels revealed two protein bands. The larger was a broad band with an apparent molecular weight of 47,000, while the other, a sharper band, had an apparent molecular weight of 27,000. No glycosylation of these bands was detected. The lipid composition of the isolated gap junctions was similar to that of the plasma membrane fraction from which they were derived, except for the apparent absence of sphingomyelin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)37777-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Hertzberg, E. L., & Gilula, N. B.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979-03
Volume
254
Issue
6
Pages
2138-2147
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1527359894
Cited by
235
References
1
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolation and characterization of gap junctions from rat liver. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)37777-3
The paper
Hertzberg, E. L., & Gilula, N. B. (1979). Isolation and characterization of gap junctions from rat liver. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)37777-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.