The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detergent binding as a measure of hydrophobic surface area of integral membrane proteins.
Open accessAbstract
The mode by which four nonionic detergents interact with integral membrane proteins was studied by relating detergent binding to characteristic detergent monolayer and micellar dimensions and to the surface area of the hydrophobic sector of the proteins. The detergents used (C12E8, Triton X-100, dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside, and dodecyldimethylamineoxide) are efficient membrane solubilizers, which, according to our hydrodynamic analysis, form small approximately spherical micelles. Their binding by protomeric forms of bacteriorhodopsin, photosynthetic reaction center, sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)-ATPase, and cytochrome oxidase was measured after equilibration and delipidation, both by the use of successive chromatographies on silica gel and the use of agarose gel columns in combination with DEAE-cellulose chromatography. It was found that, despite detergent binding by silica gel, both chromatographic procedures gave equivalent and consistent results. The data obtained show systematic trends; thus dodecyldimethylamineoxide exhibited the highest binding levels, followed by dodecylmaltoside, whereas the polyethylene glycol detergents C12E8 and Triton X-100 had the lowest degree of binding. This ranking order is inversely related to the cross-sectional areas of these detergents in monolayers at an air-water interface and in micelles. Binding was reduced by aggregation of protomers, whereas the presence of strongly bound residual lipid slightly increased it. Among the membrane proteins with a high molecular mass (reaction center, Ca(2+)-ATPase, and cytochrome oxidase), relative binding could be related to the size of their hydrophobic sectors. On the other hand, bacteriorhodopsin bound somewhat more detergent per transmembrane helix, probably because of less steric hindrance, caused by the absence of a sizable hydrophilic domain in this protein. Theoretical calculations indicated monolayer binding of detergent to the hydrophobic surface of membrane proteins to be a better model for interaction with membrane proteins than binding of the detergents in micellar form.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Detergents for the stabilization and crystallization of membrane proteins
Privé, G. G. (2007) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.01.007 · Cited by 532
Amphipols: Polymers that keep membrane proteins soluble in aqueous solutions
Tribet, C., Audebert, R., & Popot, J.-L. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.26.15047 · Cited by 473
Mimicking the Cell: Bio-Inspired Functions of Supramolecular Assemblies
Tu, Y., Peng, F., Adawy, A., Men, Y., Abdelmohsen, L. K. E. A., & Wilson, D. A. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00344 · Cited by 316
Functional Characterization of Rhodopsin Monomers and Dimers in Detergents
Jastrzebska, B., Maeda, T., Zhu, L., Fotiadis, D., Filipek, S., Engel, A., Stenkamp, R. E., & Palczewski, K. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m408691200 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Møller, J. V., & le Maire, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 18659-18672
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1578237028
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detergent binding as a measure of hydrophobic surface area of integral membrane proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)46681-6
- The paper
- Møller, J. V., & le Maire, M. (1993). Detergent binding as a measure of hydrophobic surface area of integral membrane proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)46681-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.