The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The distribution of phosphorylation sites among identified proteolytic fragments of mammalian neurofilaments.
Open accessAbstract
Neurofilaments were treated with chymotrypsin or with Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease (V8 protease) and the proteolytic fragments in soluble and particulate centrifugal fractions were identified by immune blotting, using antibodies raised against the Mr = 68,000 (P68), 145,000 (P145), and 200,000 (P200) subunits. The data provide further evidence that each of the three subunits has a different disposition within the filament. A Mr = 160,000 fragment of P200, which may correspond to the side arm projections on neurofilaments, was released into solution by chymotrypsin. In contrast, the proteolytic fragments of P68 and P145 were recovered mainly in the particulate centrifugal fraction, indicating that the two subunits are more closely associated with the filament backbone. Proteolytic cleavage studies on neurofilaments that were 32P-labeled in vivo indicated that the phosphorylated domains in P200 and P145 are localized in a restricted segment of each subunit, which occurs between the chymotryptic and V8 protease cleavage sites. No 32P was associated with the bulk of chymotryptic fragments, which are found in the particulate fraction, are about 40,000 daltons in size, and derive from all three neurofilament subunits. Most of the phosphorylation sites in neurofilaments are peripherally located in the projection domain of P200, suggesting that phosphorylation may modulate interactions between neurofilaments and other neuronal components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carden, M., Trojanowski, J., Schlaepfer, W., & Lee, V. (1987) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.07-11-03489.1987 · Cited by 499
Yuan, A., Rao, M. V., Veeranna, & Nixon, R. A. (2012) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.104729 · Cited by 402
Neurofilaments: neurobiological foundations for biomarker applications
Gafson, A. R., Barthélemy, N. R., Bomont, P., Carare, R. O., Durham, H. D., Julien, J.-P., Kuhle, J., Leppert, D., Nixon, R. A., Weller, R. O., et al. (2020) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa098 · Cited by 325
Self-citationNeurofilament phosphorylation: a new look at regulation and function
NIXON, R., & SIHAG, R. (1991) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(91)90062-y · Cited by 309
The effects of dephosphorylation on the structure of the projections of neurofilament
Hisanaga, S., & Hirokawa, N. (1989) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.09-03-00959.1989 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Julien, J. P., & Mushynski, W. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1983-03
- Volume
- 258
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4019-4025
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1605866475
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The distribution of phosphorylation sites among identified proteolytic fragments of mammalian neurofilaments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)32770-4
- The paper
- Julien, J. P., & Mushynski, W. E. (1983). The distribution of phosphorylation sites among identified proteolytic fragments of mammalian neurofilaments. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)32770-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.