The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mercuric reductase. Purification and characterization of a transposon-encoded flavoprotein containing an oxidation-reduction-active disulfide.
Open accessAbstract
The flavoprotein mercuric reductase catalyzes the two-electron reduction of mercuric ions to elemental mercury using NADPH as an electron donor. It has now been purified from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO9501 carrying the plasmid pVS1. In this plasmid system, where the mer operon is on the transposon Tn501, mercuric reductase comprises up to 6% of the soluble cellular protein upon induction with mercurials. The purification is a rapid (two-step), high yield (80%) procedure. Anaerobic titrations of mercuric reductase with dithionite revealed the formation of a charge transfer complex with an absorbance maximum around 540 nm. Striking spectroscopic similarities to lipoamide dehydrogenase and glutathione reductase were observed. These two enzymes, which catalyze the transfer of electrons between pyridine nucleotides and disulfides, are flavoproteins which contain an oxidation-reduction-active cysteine residue at the active site. The expectation that mercuric reductase contains a similar electron acceptor was confirmed when it was shown that mercuric reductase has the capacity to accept four electrons per FAD-containing subunit, and that two thiols become kinetically titrable by 5,5'-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoate) upon reduction with NADPH. These are characteristic features of the disulfide reductase class of flavoproteins. Further similarities with at least one of these enzymes, lipoamide dehydrogenase, include the E/EH2 midpoint potential (-269 mV), fluorescence properties, and extinction coefficients of E and EH2. Preliminary observations relevant to an understanding of the mechanism of mercuric reductase are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems
Barkay, T., Miller, S. M., & Summers, A. O. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00046-9 · Cited by 1,054
Phytoremediation of metals: using plants to remove pollutants from the environment
Raskin, I., Smith, R. D., & Salt, D. E. (1997) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(97)80106-1 · Cited by 935
Wu, G., Kang, H., Zhang, X., Shao, H., Chu, L., & Ruan, C. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.113 · Cited by 640
Marques, A. P. G. C., Rangel, A. O. S. S., & Castro, P. M. L. (2009) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380701798272 · Cited by 608
Development of transgenic yellow poplar for mercury phytoremediation
Rugh, C. L., Senecoff, J. F., Meagher, R. B., & Merkle, S. A. (1998) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1098-925 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, B., & Walsh, C. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 257
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2498-2503
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1665305383
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mercuric reductase. Purification and characterization of a transposon-encoded flavoprotein containing an oxidation-reduction-active disulfide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)34951-2
- The paper
- Fox, B., & Walsh, C. T. (1982). Mercuric reductase. Purification and characterization of a transposon-encoded flavoprotein containing an oxidation-reduction-active disulfide. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)34951-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.