Cited by 185Cellular transport and secretionGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

Cloning of cDNAs encoding human lysosomal membrane glycoproteins, h-lamp-1 and h-lamp-2. Comparison of their deduced amino acid sequences.

Open access
Fukuda, M, Viitala, J, Matteson, J, Carlsson, S R·1988·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

We have isolated and sequenced cDNA clones corresponding to the entire coding sequences of the human lysosomal membrane glycoproteins, lamp-1 and lamp-2 (h-lamp-1 and h-lamp-2). The deduced amino acid sequences indicate that h-lamp-1 and h-lamp-2 consist of 416 and 408 amino acid residues, respectively, and suggest that 27 and 28 NH2-terminal residues are cleavable signal peptides. The major portions of both h-lamp-1 and h-lamp-2 reside on the luminal side of the lysosome and are heavily glycosylated by N-glycans: h-lamp-1 and h-lamp-2 were found to contain 19 and 16 potential N-glycosylation sites, respectively. The findings are consistent with the results obtained by endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase F treatment of h-lamp-1 and h-lamp-2 precursors, described in the preceding paper (Carlsson, S. R., Roth, J., Piller, F., and Fukuda, M. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 18911-18919). These N-glycosylation sites are clustered into two domains separated by a hinge-like structure enriched with proline and serine in h-lamp-1 or proline and threonine in h-lamp-2. The two domains of h-lamp-1 on each side of the hinge region are homologous to each other, whereas no such homology was detected between the two domains of h-lamp-2. Both proteins have one putative transmembrane domain consisting of 24 hydrophobic amino acids near the COOH terminus, and contain a short cytoplasmic segment composed of 11 amino acid residues at the COOH-terminal end. Comparison of h-lamp-1 and h-lamp-2 sequences r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)37370-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fukuda, M., Viitala, J., Matteson, J., & Carlsson, S. R.
Affiliations
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute (US)
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-12
Volume
263
Issue
35
Pages
18920-18928
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1549347094
Cited by
185
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA 33000, CA 28896)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
LAMP1, LAMP2, lysosomal membrane glycoprotein, cDNA cloning, amino acid sequence, signal peptide, N-glycosylation sites, hinge region, transmembrane domain, lysosomal targeting, protein evolution, sequence homology, lysosomes, protein glycosylation
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Chickens, Cloning, Molecular, DNA, Glycosylation, Humans, Lysosomes, Membrane Glycoproteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Antigens, CD, Mice, Lysosomal Membrane Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review